A government bid to delay plans to tackle illegal levels of air pollution in Scotland and the rest of the UK have been rejected by the High Court.
The court has now given UK ministers a new deadline of 4pm on May 9 for the plans to be made public.
The government was ordered by the court last November to produce an Air Quality Plan to tackle illegal pollution levels across the UK by 4pm on Monday.
But on Friday after the court closed, and less than one working day before the judge-imposed deadline, government lawyers applied to defer publication until after the general election.
The presiding High Court judge also refused to grant permission to appeal, saying the government would have to go direct to the Appeal Court if it wishes to appeal the decision.
The court ruled that there was "no adequate explanation" to back up the government's assertion that a delay in publishing the draft plan would not delay its implementation, adding that the impact of air pollution made it the impacts of air pollution were "exceptional public health circumstances".
James Eadie QC, representing the government, had told the court that the draft plan was “ready to go” but should be delayed because of purdah designed to stop political parties using the machinery of government for electoral advantage in the run-up to an election.
But Mr Justice Garnham said that purdah, the pre-election period, does not affect the outcome of a High Court case and "is not a trump card to be deployed at will by one litigant," with the judge adding that the government must comply with a court order like anyone else.
The Government was ordered to publish updated clean air proposals by April 24, after courts ruled existing plans to meet EU-mandated air quality limits, which are being broken across many areas of the country, were not sufficient.
The development comes just two months after it emerged Britain faced multi-million pound fines if it does not heed a final warning by the European Commission over its failure to address harmful levels of toxic air in the UK, with Scotland amongst the worst offenders in the country.
The new plans that meet the legal requirement to cut illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution in the “shortest possible time” was expected to involve clean air zones in many cities and towns across the country.
But the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs applied last week to delay publication
Mr Eadie told the court that Sue Gray, a Cabinet Office official, had raised “serious concerns about the appropriateness of publishing this in the sensitive period” given the impending general and local elections. He claimed publication of the plan would “drop a matter of key controversy into particular localities” and a “controversial bomb” into the mix of local and general elections.
But environmental lawyers ClientEarth said there should be no delay in publication saying the issue of air quality is a “huge issue of public concern”.
Some 2000 early deaths are caused every year in Scotland because of polluted air according to the latest medical research, with some 40,000 across the UK.
Glasgow has been described as "the most polluted city in Scotland" by environmental lawyers ClientEarth over what it called "illegal and harmful levels" of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which comes mostly from diesel vehicles.
Data produced by the EU shows that Glasgow has the highest average annual concentration of NO2 outside of London, with 68 micrograms of NO2 per cubic metre of air - 70 per cent higher than the Euro limit.
A Downing Street spokesman said: "We will consider the judgement and then decide what we do next."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel