Sir Richard Branson has said a hard Brexit would be a "disaster" for the UK and could warrant a second referendum.
The tycoon claimed it was "important that people have a second chance" if "the facts change or once the facts are known", following negotiations to leave the EU.
He told the Press Association: "The people voted for the Government to come out of Europe based on £350 million more going into the NHS, and a whole lot of things they were promised.
"Let's see if these promises come true in a year or two years' time - and if those promises are not on the table and in fact the country is really suffering, and the costs are going to really cripple the country, then it's important, I think, there are MPs who can stand up and say something needs to be done about this - we can't just destroy a beautiful country."
Sir Richard, who was speaking at the inaugural Virgin Sport Hackney Festival of Fitness in east London, said that he was not "wanting to change the will of the people" despite his company giving thousands of pounds to the organisation behind a campaign to encourage people to vote tactically in the General Election.
The billionaire said he helped to "pay for the office" which is used by Gina Miller, the businesswoman whose legal action forced a parliamentary vote on withdrawal from the EU.
She launched the Best For Britain crowdfunded initiative to influence the result in marginal seats last week.
Sir Richard's Virgin Management Limited put £25,000 towards the start-up costs of UK-EU Open Policy Limited in January, which runs the Best for Britain campaign.
He explained: "If the negotiations mean that Britain is going to be damaged, we want to be sure that this office looks at the negotiations carefully and doesn't just let the Government get away with pushing through an outcome that is really bad for Great Britain.
"I put a bit of money into helping fund the office and then I think since then Gina Miller is using that office as well."
The Virgin boss said that people had voted in last year's referendum without knowing the "truth", and said that "when everything has been negotiated, the House of Commons really should be given the facts and they should vote on whether it's a good idea or not".
"A hard Brexit would be, I think, a disaster for this country and therefore if they try to push that through, it's not what people were promised and it's important that people have a chance to have another think."
However, Sir Richard added: "If they can negotiate something which is in the interests of Great Britain that's great, let's go with it.
"But if it's palpably not in the interests and the country is being damaged then MPs should decide on these things, and have a say, in my opinion."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel