A former Scottish Police Authority board member has accused the watchdog chair of bullying her and of not being fit to remain in his job.
Moi Ali, who quit the SPA after objecting to the body’s secrecy proposals, also told MSPs that Andrew Flanagan would not have treated a man in the same way.
She also claimed that the previous SPA chair, Vic Emery, had described her as a “one-trick diversity pony”, but that the document had been shredded.
In December, the SPA backed a new “governance framework” that critics believed rolled backed on basic transparency.
The watchdog moved to private committee meetings and agreed to only publish board papers on the day of a meeting.
Ali, a founding board member, objected to the proposals in public session and asked for her dissent to be formally noted.
Flanagan then sent Ali a private letter expressing his “dismay” at her criticism and suggested it would not be fair for her to continue attending committee meetings. Ali quit within weeks.
At a meeting of Holyrood’s Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny committee, Ali was asked by Labour MSP Monica Lennon if Mr Flanagan's letter amounted to bullying:
She replied: “Yes, I believe that it did. A good leader, if he had any concerns, would surely speak to an individual. I think all of us would do that. To write a letter of that nature, it’s hard to find another word to what it amounts to.”
She added later: "Did I feel bullied? Yes."
Asked if she believed Mr Flanagan would have sent the same letter to a man, Ms Ali said: “No, I don’t think he would.”
Asked if Mr Flanagan was “fit to continue” as SPA chair, she said: “I’m afraid I don’t. He’s actually not fit to continue on any public board, as he clearly doesn’t observe public sector values.”
Ms Ali also said her departure had been a "horrendous experience” and a “very difficult thing to live through”.
She also claimed that her exit had been "straightforward punishment."
In another passage of evidence, Ms Ali turned to claims about Mr Emery, who was Mr Flanagan’s predecessor.
She told MSPs: “I had asked for information where the [former] chair had said that I was a one-trick diversity pony.”
She added: “He said, ‘it isn’t me saying that, it is HMICS’. I said that I didn’t believe that that was the case, and I didn’t believe HMICS would use that terminology. I wanted to see the information, and he said that I couldn’t have it, so I made a formal request.”
Ms Ali then said she was informed by the SPA that the document had been “securely disposed of”.
Asked by SNP MSP Alex Neil who was the author of “one trick” statement was, she said: “The previous chair.”
At the stormy session, three serving SPA board members appeared to fault Mr Flanagan for not sharing a letter sent by Derek Penman, the HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary in Scotland, which criticised the governance framework proposals.
George Graham said: “I would have expected that letter to have been circulated to us.”
His colleague, David Hume, said: “I think the letter should have been passed on.”
The third SPA board member, Iain Whyte, said: “I would have expected it to be circulated.”
An SPA spokesperson said: "Moi Ali tendered her resignation from the Board of the SPA and her reasons are documented and publicly available - at no point was bullying alleged and the Chair rejects this suggestion."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel