Theresa May has defended Tory plans to protect winter fuel allowance for all Scottish pensioners while cutting it for many south of the border.
The Prime Minister said devolution meant different choices could be made in Scotland but insisted the plans for means-testing in England were fair.
Labour claims up to 10 million pensioners are set to lose the benefit under the Conservatives' plans.
Read more: SNP, Tories and Labour enjoy small gains in latest election polling
Asked why it was fair for people in England to lose it when Scottish pensioners are protected, Mrs May replied: "Well, we have devolution in the United Kingdom and as a government we have given the Scottish government significant powers in relation to welfare and they make a number of decisions about various welfare benefits in Scotland.
"The decision we have made about winter fuel payments is that we will continue to ensure that the least well-off pensioners are supported but there is a principle of fairness.
"You see well-off pensioners getting help with their fuel bill and struggling ordinary families not having that help available."
Read more: May rules out second Scottish referendum for at least another five years
Mrs May said the money released from the change in winter fuel would go into health and social care.
But quizzed on the plans as she visited a haulage firm in North Berwick, the Prime Minster side-stepped questions about whether 10 million pensioners would be hit.
"We are going to make changes for the payments of the winter fuel payments but we will continue to ensure that the least well-off pensioners are protected," she said.
The Conservative manifesto in Scotland says the winter fuel allowance will not be means tested.
It states: "We will also maintain all pensioner benefits in Scotland, including free bus passes and TV licences for the duration of this parliament.
"Social security devolution allows us to make different choices in Scotland and so we will protect universal Winter Fuel Payments for all older people and they will not be subject to means-testing.
Read more: SNP, Tories and Labour enjoy small gains in latest election polling
"We will focus on ensuring that no pensioner has to live in a hard-to-heat home in Scotland by the end of the next decade through significant investment in energy efficiency."
Scottish Secretary David Mundell suggested that the weather formed part of the reason for protecting the universal benefit north of the border, highlighting the "different climatic issues".
He told The Herald: "The specific view in relation to Scotland is that obviously we have different climatic issues and we have a different geography and there are far more people off-grid, who receive their fuel from not the gas or electricity grid but in terms of liquid gas, for example."
Labour and the Liberal Democrats criticised Mrs May over the proposals.
Tim Farron said: "The Tories are utter hypocrites. How can they take cash off English pensioners and then give it to Scottish pensioners? It looks like a cheap election bung and it won't wash."
The Lib Dem leader added: "David Mundell then turns himself into a fourth rate Michael Fish to blame the climate of Scotland as a rationale for all this. They are just taking voters for a ride."
Read more: May rules out second Scottish referendum for at least another five years
Labour campaign chief Andrew Gwynne said: "When the Scottish Tory Leader comes out against her own party's attack on pensioner incomes I think it's fair to say the policy is starting to unravel.
"The Tory attack on pensioners' winter fuel allowance is unfair and outrageous, and lays bare the threat they pose to pensioners' security and living standards.
"The Tories should admit they've got it wrong, apologise and drop it immediately."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel