SCOTLAND'S chief fire officer will be told this week that his service is in crisis with firefighters feeling "undervalued, under paid" and "under huge stress", and that because of cutbacks fire engines are sitting idle and unable to protect communities.
Alasdair Hay will be challenged by Fire Brigades Union (FBU) official Chris McGlone when they both appear at Holyrood's justice committee as part of a review into the merger of Scotland's fire services in 2013.
McGlone will say the shake-up has led to "demotivated and demoralised" firefighters on different rates of pay across the country.
Claims that public safety is being compromised with fire engines left idle due to a lack of funding will also be raised by McGlone, who is the FBU's most senior Scottish official.
Areas such as Aberdeen and the Borders are being left with less emergency cover, including river rescue services, than cities like Edinburgh and Glasgow, the union says.
The FBU also said firefighters in northern Scotland and the Borders are paid up to £1,000 less than their colleagues in Scotland's Central Belt.
McGlone claims the service suffers from "demotivated and demoralised staff who have become increasingly detached" and who feel "undervalued, under paid and in many areas of the organisation over worked and under huge stress."
Adding: "Operational fire engines sit idle in stations across the service, unavailable to protect the local communities they are there to serve."
In response, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: “As the minister for community safety made clear when addressing the Scottish Fire Symposium this week, the work of firefighters across the country is absolutely invaluable in keeping our communities safe."
A Scottish Fire and Rescue Service spokeswoman added: "Our resource budget – from which we pay our personnel and operational costs – has had a real terms cut of £2.6million this year alone so it is imperative that we now look at new and efficient ways to deliver our service."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel