THE Church of Scotland has paved the way to allowing same sex marriage in church after a historic debate that also backed a formal apology to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual people for decades of discrimination.
The landmark move came after more than three hours of highly charged and emotional debate at the Church’s General Assembly, the annual gathering of senior Kirk figures, in Edinburgh, but it is believed same sex Kirk marriages may still be up to six years away.
Read more: Barack Obama to attend Edinburgh charity dinner tonight
Former Moderator the Very Rev Professor Iain Torrance, below, convener of the Theological Forum which set out grounds for the apology and also to prepare steps towards allowing same sex marriage in church, said the Kirk would examine legal protection for minsters who "decline to officiate as a matter of conscience".
Rev Scott Rennie, below, the openly gay minister whose 2009 appointment to an Aberdeen church became the reference point of the modern sexuality debate within the church, gave the assembly of around 730 commissioners an impassioned account of his personal struggle.
Read more: Increased armed police drafted in in Scotland after Manchester terror attack
He said: “I’m tired of coming year after year to this assembly hall and seeing people like me and other LGBT Christians reduced to sex, sexual practices and it seems to me to be an unhealthy obsession with sex by some straight men.
“This never happens to heterosexuals and in their relationships.”
He went on: “If you lived with me you would know that I can be as untidy as anything and my husband Dave has to put up with my failure to see and tidy up the mess.
“In difficult times it is Dave who has shown me the faithfulness of God.
Read more: Barack Obama to attend Edinburgh charity dinner tonight
“In periods when the sheer strain of working for an institution which often feels hostile and whose thoughtlessness and carelessness has resulted in depression and anxiety for me it is he who has been there every day of my life.”
He said: "There's no one in this hall can truthfully say that his love does not reflect the love of Jesus."
Rev Steven Reid, of Crossfield linked with Kirkfieldbank said of the report there was “reference about what Jesus says about marriage in Heaven but no reference about marriage on Earth”.
Read more: Increased armed police drafted in in Scotland after Manchester terror attack
Scripture was debated
He said that "probably the most important [issue] is the lack of serious engagement with the teaching of the Bible itself.
"There's a large section on Scripture which almost seems that the section is there in order to not engage with what Scripture says."
Rev Howard Hudson, of Glasgow Bridgeton St Francis in the East, quizzed the Kirk's stance in relation to the position of marriage being between a man and a woman.
Read more: Barack Obama to attend Edinburgh charity dinner tonight
He said: "The report speaks about the authority of Jesus Christ speaking in the Scripture so how should we in the light of this report interpret Jesus’ teaching in Matthew chapter 19 and Mark chapter 10 that marriage is between a man and a woman?"
Above: The Mound
Professor Torrance said: "I think we also relate that verse to a series of other verses, and we read that verse as not being a definitive account of the only possible relationship.”
He said the spirit of the report was seeking to hold a middle-of-the-road position that “does not throw people from either side under the bus”.
Read more: Increased armed police drafted in in Scotland after Manchester terror attack
Challenged over the make-up of the forum, he said there was “diversity in terms of age and gender, and robust representation” of conservatism, and that 100 per cent of members of the forum have academic qualifications.
In one of a number of motions and counter-motions, Rev Dr Andrew Gardner, who has the international charge of Brussels St Andrews, had a push to shelve the process rejected.
Above: Some votes were close
He called on the assembly to "instruct the forum to engage in further reflection on the issues surrounding same-sex marriage and bring to a future general assembly a further report that deals with the spectrum of views on this issue," but the motion was heavily defeated.
Read more: Barack Obama to attend Edinburgh charity dinner tonight
He said: "Having read the report I was a wee bit disappointed with it. I don't believe that this report serves our general assembly as well as it could.
He said the report referenced "only one side of a very complex argument".
Rev Jonathan de Groot, below, of Glasgow Sandyford Memorial, gave notice of dissent, a recorded stance against the agreed move which does not affect the decision.
Rev Peter Johnston, below, of Ferryhill Parish Church, said his 17-year-old daughter is “proudly" gay and added: "I make no apologies for this being very personal.”
Read more: Increased armed police drafted in in Scotland after Manchester terror attack
He said: “I’m thankful for a congregation in which she can feel inclusion.”
But he said at this stage he would have to reject officiating at her church marriage, saying “the Church would not allow it”.
"This has been clawing at my heart for these past few years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel