Kell Brook's heartache in losing his IBF welterweight title in his home city of Sheffield has been compounded by the news he is facing another operation to repair a broken eye socket.
Brook battled valiantly against Errol Spence Jr and more than matched his American foe for the large majority of the bout, but significant swelling around his left eye sustained in the seventh round took a severe toll.
He was knocked down in the 10th before taking a knee under no undue pressure in the following round, with referee Howard Foster calling a halt to proceedings at Bramall Lane.
The 31-year-old revealed on Sunday that he had sustained an identical injury to the one inflicted by middleweight king Gennady Golovkin eight months ago - albeit to the opposite eye broken by the Kazakh, nicknamed GGG.
Brook had a metal plate inserted into his face following the Golovkin defeat and is set to go under the surgeon's knife once more, while it seems unlikely he will box again this year.
"The eye is broken again, the same as the GGG one, I need surgery again and I am devastated. It kept going to double vision and that's why I went down on one knee," Brook said on Sky Sports News HQ.
Brook also admitted he had the words of his surgeon ringing in his ears following his fifth-round stoppage defeat to Golovkin in his last bout.
"I remember the surgeon telling me if I'd have gone a round or so extra (against Golovkin) I could have gone blind and I had that in my mind," he added.
His promoter Eddie Hearn acknowledged it will be another long road to recovery for Brook.
"It's a big blow to his career. There was a lot of pain going through the first one and now he's got to go through another one, but that's boxing," he said.
"It was caused by Errol Spence who is a great fighter and the better man won."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here