A LEADING Scottish think tank has called for the scrapping of a new trade union law which restricts the right to strike.
The Jimmy Reid Foundation (JRF) made the call after the RMT union lost a ballot on London Underground when it failed to reach a legal threshold for industrial action despite there being overwhelming majority support from those who voted.
Under the UK Government's Trade Union Act strikes are outlawed when they have not been voted for by at least 40 per cent of eligible union members and where the turnout does not reach 50 per cent.
In one of the first cases under the new legislation, although 80 per cent of those RMY members who returned ballots voted to strike over "victimisation" that was just a 34 per cent of those eligible which meant that the overwhelming vote for action was not legally valid.
In a report about the RMT case last week the JRF argued that it showed the urgent need to scrap the law that restricts strikes.
The JRF report said: “Even the case of the RMT, which lost a ballot this week for industrial action on the London Underground amongst 3743 members, shows that passing both the thresholds of 50 per cent turnout and 40 per cent support of all those entitled to vote is a Herculean task.
“Some union members will say 'if the RMT can't attain the thresholds, what chance have we got?'
“This underscores the urgent need for a Corbyn-led Labour government to implement its policy of repealing the Trade Union Act and introduce the reform of collective labour law in order to guarantee workers' rights.”
However, Tory MSP Murdo Fraser defended the legislation passed in the last parliament.
He said: "If trade unions cannot interest a reasonable proportion of their members in strike action the the public should not have to suffer."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here