US President Donald Trump has said he “did not make” and does not have any recordings of his private conversations with ousted former FBI director James Comey.
“With all of the recently-reported electronic surveillance, intercepts, unmasking and illegal leaking of information,” Mr Trump said he has “no idea” whether there are “tapes” or recordings of the two men’s conversations.
However, he declared he “did not make, and do not have, any such recordings”.
With all of the recently reported electronic surveillance, intercepts, unmasking and illegal leaking of information, I have no idea…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 22, 2017
…whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 22, 2017
The tweets are the latest chapter in a high-stakes guessing game after Mr Trump hinted he might have recordings of his private conversations with Mr Comey at the White House and over the phone.
The tale of mystery began last month just days after Mr Trump fired Mr Comey, who was then leading an investigation into contacts before and after the election between the president’s campaign and Russian officials.
The absence of recordings almost certainly elevates in significance to investigators the notes made by Mr Comey right after the conversations.
A New York Times report cited two unnamed Comey associates who recounted his version of a January dinner with the president in which Mr Trump asked for a pledge of loyalty.
James Comey better hope that there are no "tapes" of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 12, 2017
Mr Comey declined, instead offering to be “honest”.
When Mr Trump then pressed for “honest loyalty”, Mr Comey told him, “You will have that”, the associates said.
Mr Trump tweeted the next day that Mr Comey “better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!”
Mr Trump’s tweets on Thursday raised questions about why the president would have staked his reputation and political capital on promoting something that was not real.
Despite so many false statements and lies, total and complete vindication…and WOW, Comey is a leaker!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 9, 2017
His earlier suggestion about tapes immediately evoked the secret White House recordings that led to Richard Nixon’s downfall in the Watergate scandal.
Under a post-Watergate law, the Presidential Records Act, recordings made by presidents belong to the people and can eventually be made public. Destroying them would be a crime.
Mr Comey says any recordings that might exist would support his version that Mr Trump asked him to pledge loyalty and urged him to drop the investigation into the president’s former national security adviser.
“Lordy, I hope there are tapes,” Mr Comey declared at a congressional hearing.
The president has steadfastly refused to clarify whether any tapes existed. Two weeks ago, he teased reporters in the White House rose garden by saying that he would explain “maybe some time in the very near future”.
He cryptically added: “You are going to be very disappointed when you hear the answer.”
White House deputy press secretary Lindsay Walters said on Wednesday that an answer would be provided this week, presumably by the Friday deadline set by the House intelligence committee for turning over any tapes.
The Secret Service had said it had no audio copies or transcripts of any tapes recorded within Mr Trump’s White House, according to a freedom of information request submitted by The Wall Street Journal.
That did not exclude the possibility that recordings were created by another entity.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel