The White House has issued a warning to Bashar Assad as it claimed “potential” evidence showed Syria was preparing for another chemical weapons attack.
In an ominous statement, issued with no supporting evidence or further explanation, press secretary Sean Spicer said the US “has identified potential preparations” for another chemical attack by Bashar Assad’s government that “would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children”.
Mr Spicer said the activities were similar to preparations taken before a chemical attack in April, that killed dozens of men, women and children, and warned that if “Mr Assad conducts another mass murder attack using chemical weapons, he and his military will pay a heavy price”.
Statements from @PressSec on #syria pic.twitter.com/gEqPAf6WBk
— Sean Spicer (@PressSec) June 27, 2017
The White House offered no details on what prompted the warning and spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said she had no additional information.
Several State Department officials typically involved in co-ordinating such announcements said they were caught completely off guard by the warning, which did not appear to be discussed in advance with other national security agencies.
Typically, the State Department, the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies would be consulted before the White House issued a declaration sure to reverberate across foreign capitals.
A non-governmental source with close ties to the White House said the administration had received intelligence that the Syrians were mixing precursor chemicals for a possible sarin gas attack in either the east or south of the country, where government troops and their proxies have faced recent setbacks.
.@POTUS: There can be no dispute that #Syria used banned chemical weapons, violated its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention. pic.twitter.com/9pVEBV7QHa
— U.S. Embassy Syria (@USEmbassySyria) April 7, 2017
President Assad denied responsibility for the April 4 attack on the town of Khan Sheikhoun in the rebel-held Idlib province.
Victims showed signs of suffocation, convulsions, foaming at the mouth and pupil constriction.
Days later, US president Donald Trump launched a cruise missile strike on a Syrian government-controlled air base where American officials said the chemical attack was launched.
It was the first direct American assault on the Syrian government and Mr Trump’s most dramatic military order since becoming president months before.
Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia & Iran who support him killing his own people.
— Nikki Haley (@nikkihaley) June 27, 2017
Mr Trump said at the time that the Khan Sheikhoun attack crossed “many, many lines” and put the blame squarely on Assad’s forces.
Syria maintained it had not used chemical weapons and blamed opposition fighters for stockpiling the chemicals.
Russia’s defence ministry said the toxic agents were released when a Syrian air strike hit a rebel chemical weapons arsenal and munitions factory.
The US attack on the Syrian air base came after years of heated debate and deliberation in Washington over intervention in the bloody civil war.
Chemical weapons have killed hundreds since the start of the conflict, with the United Nations blaming three attacks on the Syrian government and a fourth on the Islamic State terror group.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel