By David Young
IRELAND’S premier has warned that future trade and customs restrictions would be detrimental to both the European Union and the UK as he set out his vision for a “soft” Brexit.
Taoiseach Leo Varadkar proposed a bilateral EU/UK customs union and raised the possibility of the UK joining the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) after it exited the EU.
He said he would ideally like the UK to remain within the current customs union and single market structures but, if that did not happen, he suggested his alternative was “workable”.
In response, the UK Government said it was committed to a “deep and special” future partnership with the EU that included “bold and ambitious” free trade and customs agreements.
Mr Varadkar outlined his ideas during a visit to Queen’s University in Belfast, his first trip to Northern Ireland since replacing Enda Kenny in June.
Turning to the specific problem of the Irish border, he said a “unique solution” was needed. Mr Varadkar again moved to dispel the suggestion the Irish government favoured making the Irish Sea the EU/UK border.
In a message clearly directed at the pro-Brexit Democratic Unionists, he further claimed a “soft” Brexit could actually strengthen Northern Ireland’s place in the United Kingdom.
In response to his remarks, DUP leader Arlene Foster said, while Brexit meant leaving both the customs union and single market, she wanted to find “practical solutions” to the border issues.
Sinn Fein President Gerry Adams welcomed the Taoiseach for offering a “very, very clear message” on Brexit.
Describing Brexit as the “challenge of this generation”, Mr Varadkar repeated his hope it would not ultimately happen, suggesting a second referendum might deliver a different outcome, but he said, if it did proceed, it would be in no one’s interests to create trading barriers.
He urged continued UK membership of the customs union but said, in the absence of that, he would like to see a bilateral EU/UK customs union. “After all, we have one with Turkey. Surely we can have one with the United Kingdom?,” he said.
In regard to the single market, he suggested the UK could re-join the EFTA, like other non-EU countries such as Norway and Iceland.
“If the UK does not want to stay in the single market, perhaps it could enter into a deep Free Trade Agreement with the EU and re-join EFTA, of which it was a member prior to accession,” he said. “And if this cannot be agreed now, then perhaps we can have a transition period during which the UK stays in the single market and customs union while these things are worked out.”
He again challenged Brexiters to explain why a “hard” Brexit, with trade tariffs and customs restrictions, would benefit either the UK or Europe. “If they can’t come up with those solutions, well then maybe they might talk about mine, because the ones I have put forward are workable,” he said.
Sinn Fein and the SDLP have demanded that Northern Ireland secures special designated EU status post-Brexit to reflect the difficulties that trading restrictions would pose at the Irish border. Unionists claim this would differentiate Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.
The UK Government spokeswoman said: “We have been clear we want a deep and special future partnership with the EU, including a bold and ambitious free trade agreement and a customs agreement.“No-one wants a return to a hard border. We are clear the border must be as seamless and frictionless as possible for trade, and that we must preserve the Common Travel Area between the UK and Ireland. That is why we are prioritising this issue in negotiations.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel