A CAMPAIGN backed by the Sunday Herald to cut the normal speed limits on roads in residential areas to 20mph has won overwhelming backing from the Scottish public.
The Green MSP, Mark Ruskell, is proposing a new law to make 20mph the default limit in residential areas instead of 30mph. He polled people to find out what they thought of the idea.
Three-quarters of more than 1,500 groups and individuals who have so far responded said they were in favour. Now Ruskell says he is extending the deadline for responses an extra month to September 15 to give more people a chance to submit their views.
Amongst those backing a 20mph limit are parent groups, environmental campaigners, community councils, local authorities and eminent health bodies. They argue that slower speeds will prevent children and adults being killed or seriously injured by cars and other vehicles.
The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health says that road traffic injuries are a “major cause of preventable death” amongst children and adolescents. An average of six under-16-year-olds were killed every year on Scotland’s roads between 2011 and 2013.
In its submission the college argues that legislation is the best way to deliver change. Making 20mph the legal norm would “ensure that it is enforceable by law and that it is applied wholesale through all built up areas in the country,” it says.
According to a joint submission by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and the Glasgow Centre for Population Health, there is robust evidence that a 20mph limit will reduce the risk of accidents and serious injuries.
“We need strong political leadership in Scotland through legislation supported by communication and social marketing campaigns to normalise slower traffic speed in urban settings, change our car-dominated culture and encourage more of our population to walk, cycle and use public transport,” their submission argues.
Ruskell was “delighted” by the high level of public support for his proposed bill for the Scottish Parliament. “Even among those sceptical of the bill, there has been little outright opposition to 20mph speed limits in urban areas,” he told the Sunday Herald.
“To those who are yet to be convinced, I want them to know that I’m not proposing a blanket approach to 20mph. Councils will still be able to keep key roads at 30mph if it’s appropriate.”
Ruskell argued that a 20mph limit would make Scotland’s streets safer, and could help cut road casualties and deaths to zero. “With a new speed limit, we can also reduce pollution and any harm being done to children’s growing lungs,” he said.
The Sunday Herald reported in May that a poll of over 1,000 Scots by Survation showed majority support for a 20mph limit. Some 53 per cent said they supported the idea and 28 per cent said they opposed it, with others not expressing a view.
Ruskell’s bill has also been backed by the campaign group, 20’s Plenty for Us. “Across the world progressive communities and cities are setting 20mph and 30kmh limits for most roads to make their places better places to live and travel,” said director, Rod King.
“The global standard has been set by the World Health Organisation with a call for a 20mph/30kmh limit wherever motor vehicles conflict with pedestrians and cyclists,” he added.
“Scotland would join other countries where 20mph or 30kmh is the norm and this bill enables it to be done the smart and cost-effective way by setting a national default that still allows exceptions where appropriate.”
The Scottish Government pointed out that Transport Minister Humsa Yousaf had met with Ruskell and was looking forward to considering the outcome of the consultation.
“There are no current plans to lower the 30mph limit to 20mph on a national basis as decisions on urban speed limits are best taken at local authority level,” said a spokesman for Transport Scotland.
The Scottish Government was committed to reducing risk on Scotland’s roads, he stressed. “Our road safety partners agreed a commitment to encourage local authorities to introduce 20mph zones or limits in residential areas and places with a high volume of pedestrians and cyclists.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel