HUNDREDS of people ignored the distressed cries of a dog trapped in a hot car in a social experiment caught on film.
The three-day experiment saw just four people stop and attempt to help the fake dog, which was abandoned in temperatures exceeding 28 degrees celsius.
Confused.com, the car savings site, conducted the experiment to investigate how members of the public would react to a dog left in a vehicle on a warm day. The aim of the experiment was to raise awareness of the actions people should take, rather than finding themselves in the position of a helpless bystander.
Armed with a fake dog – called Annie – a car and realistic sound-effects, a camera crew set up camp in car parks and busy streets across the UK. They recorded the reactions of passers by who assumed a real dog had been abandoned in the vehicle on a hot day.
The camera crew waited, hidden from view, to see how people would react to the distressing barks and whining, and how many would intervene. Footage was collected over three days in July when outside temperatures were the hottest seen this year.
Throughout the entire time filming the social experiment, the overwhelming majority of passers-by failed to intervene or do anything to help the dog; instead just glancing over and walking on by, or ignoring the loud cries of the dog altogether. Only four people out of hundreds stopped to take action, with one trying to open the car in an attempt to rescue the whimpering dog. Another tried pulling down on the slightly open window to get to the dog.
During the filming, the crew had to stop a passer-by who was moments away from calling the RSPCA out of concern for the trapped dog.
Despite media warnings about the soaring temperatures vehicles can rise to on hot days, a number of drivers admit abandoning their dogs in their vehicles.
More than two fifths (42 per cent) of drivers have left their dog unattended in a car – and shockingly, a quarter (25 per cent) of these admit to doing so on a warm or hot day.
While more than one in five of these (21 per cent) claimed that it was ‘only for a short time’, a small number of people (2 per cent) confessed it had been for a long time. The research also revealed some respondents have left their dog alone in a car for as long as four hours.
Despite very few people choosing to intervene in such circumstances, many drivers have seen dogs left alone in cars in very public spaces. In fact, almost three quarters (73 per cent) revealed they have witnessed an unattended dog in a supermarket car park.
Confused.com aims to raise awareness of this important issue, as the RSPCA received 7,187 calls in 2016 about animals in hot environments. Although down from the previous year (8,779), it is still worryingly high considering the charity's key advice is to call 999.
Motorists, passengers and the public in general are being urged to be especially vigilant during the summer months and on the lookout for dogs that could have been left in a car on a warm day by careless owners.
Amanda Stretton, motoring editor at Confused.com, said: “We urge all drivers to make themselves aware of the dangers of leaving dogs in cars on a hot day, and for them to be vigilant to what is happening around them in car parks, especially during the summer months. Spotting a dog alone in a hot car might just save the animal’s life."
The RSPCA advises anyone who witnesses an unattended dog in a hot car to call 999 and report the incident. To help people be better prepared in the future, Confused.com has set up an advice page to educate people on what to do if they spot a distressed dog in a hot car.
RSPCA dog welfare expert Lisa Richards said: "If you spot a dog shut in a car on a warm day that’s showing any signs of heatstroke, you should call 999 straight away. It doesn’t even need to be a sunny day for the temperature inside a car to reach dangerous levels for a dog."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel