A controversial £2 billion wind farm development would create 2,000 construction jobs and more than 200 jobs every year of its lifespan, a study has found.
Analysis suggests that over its 30 year lifetime, the Neart na Gaoithe (NnG) project could generate an economic impact of around £827 million for the Scottish economy, equivalent to 0.6 per cent of Scotland’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2016.
The study also found it could support 13,900 “person years” of employment over its lifetime - the equivalent of around 2,000 jobs for every year of construction and 236 for every year of operation.
Developers Mainstream Renewable Power commissioned the research from the independent Fraser of Allander Institute at Strathclyde University.
It follows the RSPB applying to the Supreme Court for permission to appeal against the development, which the conservation charity believes could lead to major declines in the population of sea birds.
The RSPB says that, as a result of the turbines, in the breeding season the population of puffins in the area would be 25 per cent lower, gannet numbers would fall 21 per cent and kittiwake numbers would drop by 24 per cent.
They says the populations of guillemot and razorbill would also be affected.
The move is the next stage in a legal battle that has been ongoing since the Scottish Government gave consent to four major wind farms in the Firth of Forth and the Firth of Tay in 2014.
The charity initially won a court victory but it was later overturned, clearing the development and prompting the RSPB to seek a further appeal.
Scotland's Court of Session last month refused the application for the case to be sent to the Supreme Court, but the RSPB has now applied directly to the UK's highest court.
Andy Kinsella, chief operating officer at Mainstream Renewable Power, said: “The results of the Fraser of Allander Institute’s study show the full extent of NnG’s impact on the Scottish economy for the first time.
“The study confirms that NnG will support the creation or retention of large numbers of high skilled, high quality jobs in Scotland during construction and its 25 year operational lifetime.
“The NnG Offshore Wind Farm Coalition, launched this month, has called on RSPB Scotland to abandon its legal action challenging this project and three others.
“Today’s report shows the full extent of the economic benefit to Scotland put at risk by this ongoing action. I would ask RSPB Scotland to listen to this call and allow the project to move forward into construction.”
On making the Supreme Court application, RSPB Scotland director Anne McCall said: “RSPB Scotland has not taken this decision lightly, however our concerns with the manner in which Scottish Ministers’ took their decisions in 2014 remain undiminished.
“Additionally, the issues of the case and the recent Inner House judgement extend beyond simply the impacts of these developments on important seabird populations.
“Therefore due to the implications of this latest decision for many aspects of our work we felt we had no choice but to apply to the Supreme Court.
“We are hopeful that our application is successful and that we are granted leave to appeal so these important issues of public interest can be considered in detail by the Supreme Court.”
The wind farm project could generate enough power to supply the equivalent of 1.4 million homes.
The Scottish Government backed the project saying it is focused on creating a sustainable energy future for Scotland so that the country can meet its obligations to fight climate change, thereby tackling a key threat to marine ecosystems.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel