I AM obliged to Iain AD Mann (Letters, August 31) for his pithy suggestion that enhancing my moniker with the forename Jack would have been an improvement on my choice of Rover.
Sadly the former had been allocated to other members of the tribe and Bonnie Prince Charlie as favoured by Scotland's sheepdogs was deemed too pretentious.
In response to Dave Stewart (Letters, September 1) I too have never come across a Rover or Fido, although I knew a boy at school called Fido who allegedly once relieved himself against a lamppost.
Friend Google informs that Rover became widely popular after a short 1905 film Rescued by Roverand that Abraham Lincoln had a dog called Fido (Fidelitas, Latin, faithful).
So they come with a good pedigree.
Woof woof.
R Russell Smith,
96 Milton Road, Kilbirnie.
DAVE Stewart asks if any of us has ever called a dog Rover or known of one so called. Not as far as I can recall. My family did have a Manchester terrier called Judy, when I was about eight. I composed a poem for a homework activity, which went as follows:
I have a dog her name is Judy,
Always happy, never moody,
I give her biscuits, three or four,
Then she sits and begs for more.
I guess that cannot be called poetry, rather call it doggerel.
Thelma Edwards,
Old Comrades Hall, Hume, Kelso.
IN reply to Dave Stewart's challenge, I feel no need to confess, only to proudly and fondly remember that over the course of my childhood - in fact until I was about 20 – my family owned three beautiful border collie dogs, each successive dog being called Rover.
Maureen Lanigan,
31 Torrington Crescent, Glasgow.
DAVE Stewart wonders if anybody ever really named their dog Fido or Rover. My aunt had one of each, mother and pup. Rover was a gangster and bit postmen, but his mum was an aristocratic Gael who only answered to her name in Gaelic – Dìleas.
Dr Hamish Maclaren,
1 Grays Loan, Thornhill, Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here