COUNCILS are being canvassed for their opinions on the use of controversial mosquito devices used in a bid to prevent groups of youths from gathering in some areas.
It came as Holyrood ministers said they were “not unsympathetic” to an outright ban.
Community Safety and Legal Affairs Minister Annabelle Ewing told MSPs at Holyrood that ministers were opposed to the gadgets, and said she had written to councils and others to find out their views.
A petition was brought before the Scottish Parliament in 2010 calling for the devices, which emit a high-pitched noise audible only to those under the age of 25, to be outlawed.
At that point the Scottish Government opted not to legislate, but when asked about the matter during Holyrood questions, Ms Ewing said: “I am not unsympathetic to those who take the view that we should look to an outright ban on mosquito devices.”
But she added: “At the present time there are simply no reliable figures on how widespread or otherwise the use of mosquito devices is in Scotland.
“And to proceed successfully down a legislative route we would of course need to show that any legislation is justified as a proportionate response.”
The minister made clear that the government is “opposed to the use of mosquito anti-loitering devices” as she explained: “We do not believe their use is consistent with our approach to tackling anti-social behaviour and note that the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child has expressed concerns over their use and children’s right to movement and peaceful assembly.”
She said she had written to all of Scotland’s 32 local authorities as well as other public bodies, such as Police Scotland and Transport Scotland, on the matter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here