IT was Winston Churchill who said: “The opposition occupies the benches in front of you, but the enemy sits behind you.” But it’s not a cast-iron rule.
Alex Rowley was sitting two rows in front of Anas Sarwar at First Minister’s Questions, for instance, and he could well prove the aspirant Scottish Labour leader’s nemesis.
Now, Mr Rowley is no orator. No dramatic Churchillian rumble for him. His Fife drone sounds more like Stephen Hawking with a cold. But don’t be fooled.
He didn’t become Scottish Labour general secretary back in the day on charm alone.
He doesn’t just know where the bodies are buried, he’s a right dab hand with a spade.
As interim leader of Scottish Labour, Mr Rowley is quite neutral in the leadership race.
That’s he’s close to candidate Richard Leonard, and his daughter runs Mr Leonard’s campaign, is therefore undoubtedly irrelevant to what happened next. Undoubtedly.
Why was Nicola Sturgeon planning a £180m-a-year tax break for “frequent flyers” when there was so much child poverty, he asked.
“Every single time the SNP has a tax decision to make it sides with the millionaires rather than with the millions,” he said.
There was a snigger, then a ripple, then a roar.
Led by John Swinney and Derek Mackay, SNP MSPs pointed at Mr Sarwar, whose socialist credentials keep getting tripped up by the inconvenient fact he’s filthy rich.
The family firm behind his wealth also pays workers below Labour’s real living wage.
The SNP was “another party for the few, not the many”, Mr Rowley added, laying down an irresistible trail of bait for the sharks across the aisle.
Ms Sturgeon was hooked.
“It was really unfair of Alex Rowley to personalise this debate by bringing Anas Sarwar into it,” she grinned.
“We have a Labour leadership candidate lecturing others about doing the right thing on pay, yet his own family firm won’t pay the living wage voluntarily.”
A livid Mr Sarwar beckoned with his hand. “Bring it,” he said.
Afterwards, Mr Rowley and his chums professed themselves shocked - shocked! - that anyone could possibly think he had set Mr Sarwar up for a fall.
But to quote another famous expert on politicians: “Well, he would say that, wouldn’t he?”
.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel