TWITTER is defending its decision not to suspend President Trump over a tweet about North Korea that seems to violate its prohibition on threats of violence.
"Just heard Foreign Minister of North Korea speak at U.N.," Trump tweeted over the weekend. "If he echoes thoughts of Little Rocket Man, they won't be around much longer!"
Twitter did not remove the tweet. North Korea interpreted the tweet as a "clear declaration of war."
Responding to questions from users on why it had not removed the tweet and suspended the president's account, Twitter said "'newsworthiness' and whether a tweet is of public interest" plays a role in its decision making.
Twitter said this is an internal policy. Its public terms of service state: "You may not make threats of violence or promote violence, including threatening or promoting terrorism." Twitter acknowledged it needs to do a better job of making its rules transparent to the public.
"We'll soon update our public-facing rules to reflect it," Twitter said.
Trump waged the presidential campaign on Twitter and now, as commander-in-chief, he's using that digital bully pulpit daily to push his agenda, at times making inflammatory comments that some complain violate Twitter's terms of service, whether bashing the media, bullying politicians or baiting opponents.
Trump's use of Twitter is unprecedented for a sitting president. That has put the spotlight and pressure on Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to explain its complicated relationship with its most prominent and controversial user.
Dorsey says it's important to hear from world leaders like Trump to hold them accountable.
"I believe it's really important to have these conversations out in the open, rather than have them behind closed doors,” Dorsey said earlier this year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel