THE UK Government has refused to ban companies which were involved in blacklisting workers from gaining public sector contracts.
The SNP's workers' right spokesman, MP Chris Stephens, accused Tory ministers of "handwringing" after they refused to ban blacklisters.
"It remains a sign of bad faith that the perpetrators of blacklisting have access to public money to boost their profits," he said.
Stephens wrote to the UK's Minister for small Business Margot James MP asking for sanctions to be imposed against firms involved in the practice.
However, the Tory minister responded that she would not intervene to ban firms that were involved in the blacklisting of trade union activists.
The row came as a £29 million contract to refurbish Big Ben was awarded to construction firm Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd, which was forced to apologise and pay compensation totalling about £75m to 771 blacklisted workers last year after legal action.
In her letter to Stephens, the minister, said: "The Government takes the issue of blacklisting seriously and has an appropriate legislative framework in place for tackling it.
"Under UK public procurement rules, which implement EU rules, public procurers may already exclude a supplier on grounds of certain past behaviour like grave professional misconduct.
"It up to individual contracting authorities to apply these measures and take steps to be confident in the current practice of their contractors."
Stephens said the UK government was washing its hands of responsibility.
He said: "This is handwringing at a time when MPs have major concerns about the potential awarding of contracts such as the reconstruction of Big Ben and when serious allegations are being made by trade unions that blacklisting continues to this day.
"It's completely unacceptable that the UK Government should leave the contracting authorities," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel