Friends of former Conservative prime minister Sir Edward Heath have called for a judge-led inquiry into the handling of allegations that he raped and indecently assaulted boys as young as 10.
Wiltshire Police’s investigation, Operation Conifer, concluded that seven of the claims would have been sufficiently credible to justify questioning Sir Edward under caution.
But a further 35 allegations – including the murder of children and satanic or ritual abuse – did not meet the threshold for a formal interview.
Friends of Sir Edward, who was prime minister between 1970 and 1974, called the report “deeply flawed” and said they would be making a formal complaint to the Independent Police Complaints Commission.
Mike Veale, chief constable of Wiltshire Police, speaks to the media about Operation Conifer (Rod Minchin/PA)
Former cabinet minister Lord Hunt of Wirral said: “It is clear there is an urgent need for an independent judge-led inquiry to review the findings of Operation Conifer.
“Sir Edward’s reputation has been unfairly tarnished. No living person would be subject to a process which involves a trawl for accusations, followed by the publication of those accusations with no independent assessment of the ‘evidence’, or any details of the supposed place, time and circumstances of the alleged assaults.
“The fundamental principle that someone is innocent until proven guilty should apply to the dead as well as to the living, and no convincing evidence whatsoever against Sir Edward Heath has been produced.”
Lord Hunt, chairman of the Sir Edward Heath Charitable Foundation, described Operation Conifer as a two-year, £1.5 million “fishing expedition”.
The Operation Conifer Summary Report is now available on our website: https://t.co/XgfHiefasa pic.twitter.com/o5Vzs5hXvK
— Wiltshire Police (@wiltshirepolice) October 5, 2017
“Only seven (allegations) were regarded as sufficient even to meet the minimal standard of credibility and justifying a police interview if Sir Edward had still been alive – and the validity of some of these is now being seriously questioned,” he said.
“In view of the wholly unsatisfactory and prejudicial nature of the report, we will be writing to the Government, seeking the appointment of a retired judge to review the material collected through Operation Conifer, and other relevant material which we and others may wish to submit.
“Otherwise, Sir Edward’s reputation will be left forever in limbo, unjustly tarnished.”
Sir Edward was the most high-profile political figure linked to child sex abuse allegations that swept across Westminster.
Operation Conifer was launched in 2015 and co-ordinated inquiries by 14 police forces after Sir Edward was named as a suspect in an investigation into historical child sex abuse.
Statement from Chief Constable Mike Veale following the Operation Conifer Summary Closure Report publication https://t.co/rqMXRMqFgY
— Wiltshire Police (@wiltshirepolice) October 5, 2017
Sex workers, close protection officers from the Met, government drivers, civil servants and British intelligence services were spoken to. Sir Edward’s private papers, including letters and diaries, were also examined.
The inquiry has proven controversial since it began when a senior police officer made a television appeal outside Sir Edward’s former stately home, Arundells, urging potential victims to come forward. Police have since apologised for holding the press conference there.
Lord Hunt said he would seek access to the full report and wanted to know why “so many government officials, private secretaries and police protection officers, with intimate knowledge of Sir Edward’s movements during the periods under investigation, were not interviewed”.
He added: “We are now preparing a substantial complaint that we will want to have considered by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, covering the entire period from the crass and prejudicial, televised launch of the investigation outside Sir Edward Heath’s former home on August 3 2015, up to the extravagant launch of the summary report on October 5 2017.
“Trustees of the foundation and friends of Sir Edward have been heartened by the support we have received since the report’s publication and remain firmly convinced of his innocence.
“This stain on his character and legacy must, in all justice, be removed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel