NICOLA Sturgeon has branded Brexit a “developing disaster” and said that a second referendum if the UK crashed out of the EU with no deal might become irresistible.
Ahead of Theresa May’s Commons statement this afternoon following her keynote speech in Florence two weeks ago, the First Minister argued that the case for Scottish independence was getting stronger because of the "chaos" the Conservative Government in London was engulfed in.
However, she made clear she would not set a date for a second vote on Scotland’s future until things became clearer on where the Brexit talks were heading.
On the issue of having a second poll on EU withdrawal, Ms Sturgeon told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I’m not there right now. Part of the reason I’m not there is because we don’t know what the outcome is going to be yet.
“But, if we end up in a position where the UK crashes out of the EU with no deal at all, the consequences of that are so dire that the argument at that stage maybe irresistible that people should have the right to look at the outcome.”
Holding a second referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU could help or hinder the case for another vote on Scottish independence, depending on the outcome.
Initially, the FM had called for a vote on independence to be held in the autumn of 2018 or the spring of 2019 but has now put the timetable on hold until the terms of Brexit become clearer.
However, the Prime Minister has made clear she has no intention of granting a so-called Section 30 parliamentary order to facilitate a second Scottish vote this side of the 2022 General Election. "Now is not the time," she has insisted.
Ian Blackford, the SNP’s Westminster leader, has told The Guardian that setting a target date for a second independence poll was "putting the cart before the horse" while his Commons colleague Pete Wishart has suggested the party must first start to craft the "new case for independence 2.0" before it thought about having another vote on the issue.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel