Margaret Thatcher’s decision to approve suspected child abuser Cyril Smith for a knighthood helped him maintain close ties to children’s services, an inquiry has heard.
The late politician received the honour in 1988, despite knowledge “at the very highest level of politics” about past allegations of his sexual abuse, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse was told.
Evidence hearings have begun at the national probe to examine how Smith was able to allegedly prey on young boys at Cambridge House hostel and the Knowl View residential school in Rochdale, where Smith served as MP from 1972-1992.
But lead counsel Brian Altman QC said the knighthood conferred a “veneer of respectability and power” that afforded influence over child welfare cases at Rochdale Borough Council.
A Lancashire Police investigation into the Liberal MP’s alleged sexual abuse of young boys ended in 1970 when the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) concluded it was unlikely to lead to a prosecution. Downing Street was aware of both the investigation, based on accusations from eight boys, and two press reports into Smith’s alleged offending, documents from the time indicate.
Mr Altman said: “I mention this knighthood here for two reasons.
“First, because it demonstrates that the Lancashire investigation and the [Rochdale Alternative Press] article had been considered at the very highest level of politics and seemingly did not prompt more than consideration of the DPP’s decision not to prosecute.
“Second, because it is important to bear in mind the extent to which Cyril Smith continued to involve himself in serious issues related to the welfare of children.
“ A knighthood would only have reinforced Smith’s veneer of respectability and power.”
He pointed to a case in 1991 in which Smith apparently played a key role in removing a child from his family home.
“The child in question had behaved sexually towards his eight-year- old sister,” Mr Altman said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here