"UNIQUELY evil” Ian Brady has been denied his last request for music to be played at his cremation.
The body of the Moors murderer, who died in May aged 79, will be disposed of with “no music and no ceremony”, ruled the Chancellor of the High Court, Geoffrey Vos, on Friday.
He said it was clear that Brady was someone described by law lord Lord Steyn as “uniquely evil” and there was real and genuine public anger and distress about what might happen to his remains.
The families of his victims might well be legitimately offended by an insensitive disposal and there was a public interest in ensuring it did not create unrest or disorder, he said.
Brady and Myra Hindley, who died in prison in 2002, tortured and murdered five children in the 1960s. Four of the victims were buried on Saddleworth Moor in the south Pennines.
Brady’s executor, Robin Makin, has said there was “no likelihood” that Brady’s ashes would be spread on Saddleworth Moor but has refused to say what he intends to do with them if allowed custody.
The judge, who made it clear that he had no doubt that Makin could be trusted, said that the whole matter had “simply gone on far too long”.
He was satisfied that it was “both necessary and expedient” for it to be taken out of Makin’s hands, if the body was to be disposed of “quickly, lawfully and decently”.
He said: “Taking into account all the competing positions, the overwhelming factor in this case is the public interest. The deceased’s wishes are relevant, but they do not outweigh the need to avoid justified public indignation and actual unrest.”
An officer of Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council had said she would arrange the disposal of the ashes and he was satisfied that was the best proposal available.
The judge refused to allow the playing of the fifth movement of Hector Berlioz’s Symphonie Fantastique – Dream of the Night of the Sabbath – during the cremation as Makin requested.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here