A programme of work should be brought in to try to rebuild trust between the police and football fans if controversial legislation aimed at curbing sectarianism at matches is scrapped, MSPs have been told.
Labour's James Kelly said getting rid of the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act would not be the "end of the matter".
Mr Kelly has submitted a Member's Bill to Holyrood in a bid to repeal the legislation, which he described as being "discredited" and ineffective.
READ MORE: MEPs call for UK-EU Brexit report to be made legally binding "ASAP"
MSPs on the Scottish Parliament's Justice Committee are considering the matter, with the Labour MSP telling them he wanted to axe the existing law because "it is unfair that football fans are targeted" and he does "not think the legislation is working".
But he stated: "Separate to that, there needs to be work done with supporters and the police and the clubs to rebuild a better relationship, in order that we get more effective policing."
Mr Kelly stressed: "I don't see the repeal of this Act as being the end of the matter.
"I think there is a job for all of us to do in terms of putting out a message that religious intolerance is unacceptable, pointing to effective legislation to deal with that, and there is a big job to be done in terms of the police and the supporters. It is a two-way street to work together in order to build that trust.
"In my opinion, a programme of work would be required going forward following the repeal of this Act."
The legislation - which came into force in 2012 - criminalises behaviour which is ''threatening, hateful or otherwise offensive at a regulated football match including offensive singing or chanting''.
READ MORE: Gove adamant Brexit will work for animals ‘we love’ as draft bill published
But it was "rushed through" Holyrood in the aftermath of a an Old Firm clash in march 2011, which saw then Rangers assistant manager Ally McCoist and then Celtic manager Neil Lennon involved in angry scenes.
Lennon was also sent bullets and a parcel bomb in the post, with two other high-profile Celtic fans - the late Paul McBride QC and former Holyrood deputy presiding officer Trish Godman - also sent what police described as "viable explosive devices".
SNP MSP George Adam insisted that at the time there had been "a steady systematic worsening of behaviour at games, both on field and off the field".
Referring to the threats against Lennon, Mr McBride and Mrs Godman, he said: "With all that, surely the Scottish Government were right in bringing this legislation forward?"
But Mr Kelly told him: "What we saw was a complete overreaction from the SNP Government when they pushed the legislation through against the will of all the opposition parties."
READ MORE: MEPs call for UK-EU Brexit report to be made legally binding "ASAP"
The Labour MSP stated: "I've been a football supporter for over 40 years, I attended my first football match in 1969. I can well remember a time, particularly around the late '70s and early '80s, where there was a lot of public disorder at football matches, where there was singing of offensive songs by both sets of supporters going along to games, there were clashes inside the ground and outside the ground and there was a tense atmosphere around football."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel