The UK does not “relish” violence and taking a life is a “very serious thing”, Security Minister Ben Wallace has insisted following criticism of Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson’s suggestion that Islamist fighters should be hunted down and killed.
Mr Wallace said the UK’s intelligence agencies and armed forces “do what we have to” to keep the country safe but did so “within the rule of law”.
His comments came after Mr Williamson was condemned by political opponents after saying Britons who have fought for Islamic State should never be allowed to come back to this country and “a dead terrorist can’t cause any harm to Britain”.
The Defence Secretary used a Daily Mail interview to say those who were intent on bringing “destruction, death and bloodshed” on to the streets of Britain were being “hunted down” and that threat “eliminated”.
Asked if Mr Williamson’s comments risked encouraging extremists to carry out attacks in the UK, Mr Wallace said: “I don’t think there’s a danger of it but I do think … I’m a former soldier. Taking life is a very serious thing and, at the end of the day, this country, this Government and our intelligence services and armed forces do what we have to do to keep us safe at home and abroad.
“But we do it within the rule of law and the oversight of Parliament.”
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “We are the United Kingdom, we don’t relish violence in anything we do. We do what we have to do to keep us safe.”
Mr Wallace also said he was worried about the increased threat from far-right extremists in the UK.
“We are worried that it is increasing, and it is using all the grooming methods and the networking methods that we have seen used by other terrorist groups recently,” he said.
“That is not good for our safety and we have got to take steps to deal with it.”
He added: “Extremists on all sides of arguments would love to dominate the ground and antagonise their opponent, pushing them to the extreme to ultimately cause some form of conflict. That is part of the methodology of some of these people and we have got to make sure that we counter that.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here