Campaigners fighting to overturn a Government decision to approve a fracking site in Lancashire have lost the latest round of their legal battle.
Three Court of Appeal judges announced their decision in London on Friday to reject challenges brought by the Preston New Road Action Group (PNRAG) and environmental campaigner Gayzer Frackman, from Blackpool.
Their ruling followed a defeat for protesters at the High Court last year when they failed to persuade a judge in Manchester that the decision to grant a planning application for the site in Fylde was not fair or lawful.
UK energy company Cuadrilla’s planning application was refused by Lancashire County Council in 2015 but later granted following an appeal and a planning inquiry.
The scheme was later given the go-ahead by Cabinet minister Sajid Javid.
During an appeal hearing in August, David Wolfe QC, for the action group, told Lord Justice Simon, Lord Justice Lindblom and Lord Justice Henderson that “the Secretary of State, through his inspector, misunderstood key local and national planning policies”.
The judges were urged to “set aside” the ruling of Mr Justice Dove in the High Court and to “quash the Secretary of State’s decision”.
Argument was made on behalf of both the Communities Secretary and Cuadrilla that the challenges by PNRAG and Mr Frackman should be dismissed.
The planning permissions at the centre of the appeal are for exploratory and associated monitoring works in respect of exploration for shale gas.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here