SIR Richard Branson has instructed Virgin Trains to re-stock the Daily Mail after its decision to stop selling the newspaper was criticised as "censorship".
The train operator said it made the decision in November, pointing out in an internal note to staff that "considerable concern" had been raised by colleagues about the newspaper's editorial position on issues such as immigration, LGBT rights and unemployment.
But the Virgin boss has distanced himself from the move, saying neither he nor Brian Souter, chairman of Stagecoach, were aware of the decision before reading it in media reports.
"It was not part of some grand campaign or at my behest," Sir Richard said in a statement on Monday.
"Brian and I agree that we must not ever be seen to be censoring what our customers read and influencing their freedom of choice. Nor must we be seen to be moralising on behalf of others.
"Instead we should stand up for the values we hold dear and defend them publicly, as I have done with the Mail on many issues over the years.
"So Brian and I have instructed our team at Virgin Trains to reconsider this decision and re-stock the Daily Mail while they undertake a full review of their sales policy, making clear that this policy should not single out individual media titles."
The Mail accused Virgin Trains of censorship following the decision and claimed the company had said the only reason the paper would no longer be stocked was to "save space".
It added sales were only 70 copies a day.
Commentators and MPs also criticised the move, with Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson calling it an "absurd" and "pompous" ban that resembled censorship.
Sir Richard said the decision was made "in response to feedback from some of our Virgin Trains employees", but admitted the decision to stop selling the paper "has not been seen to live up to principles of "freedom of speech, freedom of choice and tolerance for differing views".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel