Prosecutors have insisted there is no gap in the law when it comes to the use of video evidence in wildlife crime cases.
MSPs on Holyrood’s Environment Committee questioned whether a review of the legislation was required after several cases of alleged raptor persecution were dropped.
Last year the RSPB criticised the Crown Office after video footage gathered by the charity was deemed inadmissible.
Tory MSP Finlay Carson raised the issue of “public frustration” in such cases.
He said: “When was the legislation last looked at and with advances in technology is it something that we really need to seriously take a stand on and look at what technology is available and try to change the legislation to be fit for purpose?”
Sara Shaw, head of the Crown Office wildlife and environmental crime unit, said the proportion of cases not taken forward because of the inadmissibility of video evidence was “relatively small”.
She added: “I think it’s difficult to say what legislative change would be meaningful in the abstract without a specific goal in mind.
“It is possible to use video evidence as evidence in a prosecution, the question is what are the full facts and circumstances surrounding the obtaining of that evidence that can impact on the admissibility.
“I think it’s fair to say from a Crown perspective we’ve not identified a huge gap in the law.
“Obviously it would be for the Scottish Government to consider whether a further development of legislation is required to address any concerns surrounding the use of covertly obtained video evidence in the context of wildlife crime.”
Laura Buchan, head of the Crown Office health and safety division, acknowledged the admissibility case followed by prosecutors dated to 1950.
She said: “To some that would sound archaic but actually what the law does and what investigators do is they evolve in terms of whats facing them.
“I’m not concerned about the kind of lack of legislation if there’s a consideration around that, I think that our law develops as that progresses.”
Sean Scott, Police Scotland detective chief superintendent, said directed surveillance had implications for human rights and was an issue for wider public debate.
Sergeant Andrew Marvin, Scottish wildlife crime coordinator, added: “It’s the impact this would have on wider legislation away from wildlife crime.
“That’s what you’ve always got to remember in the background here. If we were to allow that in wildlife crime situations, what’s the next step?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel