SCOTTISH Labour has been accused of a “laughable” lack of credibility on the budget after failing to say how it would stop £700m of council cuts it has railed against for weeks.
Despite repeatedly demanding “radical” use of Holyrood’s tax powers to avoid cuts, Labour finance spokesman James Kelly admitted the party still hadn't drawn up its plans.
During a Holyrood debate on the 2018-19 draft budget that Labour had instigated, he said he needed "adequate time".
During Mr Kelly's opening remarks, the SNP’s John Mason asked: “The member has mentioned £700m. Could he spell out for us how he would raise this £700m? Would there be cuts elsewhere or tax rises?”
Mr Kelly said: “Having seen what a mess the Cabinet Secretary made of his tax proposals, Labour will take adequate time…” before being drowned out by laughter.
He said that was a "perfectly defensible position" given the three-stage Budget Bill process, and the party would reveal its tax plans ahead of the Stage One debate later this month.
The debate ended with the Scottish Government agreeing to improve the draft budget after a narrow defeat.
Labour's motion said the budget would “not protect public services”.
The SNP tried to amend it with a neutral form of words, but failed by one vote.
SNP ministers and MSPs then backed a mildly critical Green amendment, which was passed by 67 votes to 56.
The result was the Government urging itself to “amend the proposals in the draft budget” to “protect public services, fund a fair pay increase for public sector workers and invest in low-carbon infrastructure” before the Budget Bill goes to a final vote in late February.
The Greens, who want an extra £150m for councils and a 3 per cent public sector pay rise, said the SNP “climbdown” showed the need for change.
MSP Patrick Harvie said: “They have accepted our view that changes are needed to protect public services, improve frontline workers’ pay and invest in low-carbon capital projects.
“Labour brought today’s debate to highlight concerns about the draft budget but failed to offer their own solutions. They are letting communities down with their posturing.”
The SNP said Labour had been shambolic: admitting they still hadn’t formulated a tax policy and attacking the Tories before voting with them.
MSP Kenneth Gibson said: “Labour have shown themselves up as completely uninterested in the serious business of government.
“Calling a debate on the budget and then admitting you don’t even have a policy on income tax goes beyond incompetence - it’s completely laughable.
“That absurd approach saw the supposed firebrand left-winger Richard Leonard’s vote with the toxic Tories against a progressive budget - and lose.”
Mr Kelly said: “This is a dramatic climb down from the SNP government. The Nationalists saw that parliament was set to vote for no confidence in their austerity budget, which will inflict an effective £700m cut on our councils, and capitulated to opposition demands. It is increasingly clear the Greens are preparing to sell our local authorities short in this budget.
“Derek MacKay must now come back with an explanation for how he is going to fund an above inflation pay rise for all public sector workers, including local government employees.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel