A BID to scrap a controversial law aimed at cracking down on sectarian behaviour at football has taken another step forward.
MSPs have backed efforts to repeal the Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Act – insisting the legislation is flawed and unnecessary.
A majority of Holyrood’s Justice Committee threw their weight behind James Kelly MSP’s Bill seeking to get rid of the law, which came into force in 2012.
Its introduction followed a notorious Old Firm match which saw three red cards, several confrontations and more than 200 arrests. Celtic manager Neil Lennon was later sent bullets and a parcel bomb in the post.
Margaret Mitchell MSP, Justice Committee convener, said that whether the law was finally repealed or not, “the message that came through from the vast majority of witnesses was that this legislation needs to be changed”.
She said: “While there is disagreement over the best way to proceed, the committee is united in its desire to have laws that help the police and prosecutors to clamp down on unacceptable behaviour.
“However, it is vitally important that our laws actually improve relationships between various groups within society, including law enforcement and sports fans.”
The Offensive Behaviour at Football Act has come under heavy criticism since its introduction, with lawyers arguing it has “not been fundamental to tackling sectarianism”.
The legislation criminalises behaviour which is ''threatening, hateful or otherwise offensive at a regulated football match including offensive singing or chanting''.
Mr Kelly has previously said there was now “more friction” between police and fans, with a need to rebuild trust if the new law is scrapped.
He said: “The unfortunate reality is the Football Act has completely failed to do anything ministers promised. Its only achievement is breaking down trust between fans and the police.”
Mr Kelly’s Bill will now progress through parliament, before a final debate and binding vote at some point in the next few months.
Annabelle Ewing, minister for community safety, said a poll commissioned by the Scottish Government previously found 80 per cent of respondents directly supported the 2012 Act.
She added: “The evidence in this report clearly sets out that a range of organisations have highlighted real concerns to MSPs about depriving our law enforcement agencies of this legislation completely without putting a viable alternative in place.
“We share those manifest concerns that repeal will send entirely the wrong message, leaving vulnerable communities feeling exposed to abuse and prejudice and putting Scotland behind the rest of the UK in terms of protection from incitement to religious hatred.”
She added: “Singing songs about terrorism, mocking incidents involving loss of life and being hateful towards some of our most vulnerable communities with no regard for the impact of their wilful behaviours is not acceptable in a modern Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel