More than 220,000 people have been given “zero scores” in both parts of the test for disability benefits in only 18 months, according to new figures.
Labour’s Angela Eagle called the statistics “deeply worrying” and said it reflected growing numbers of cases causing people great distress in her constituency.
Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessments score people points based on their ability to carry out different tasks.
For each component of PIP, people need at least eight points to get the standard rate or 12 points to get the higher enhanced payments.
Figures obtained by Ms Eagle through written parliamentary questions show 220,390 people scored “zero points” in the tests for both the mobility and daily living component of PIP between April 2016 and October 2017.
Analysis by the Press Association also suggests a greater proportion of claimants are now scoring zero on both parts of the test.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said decisions on PIP were made after careful consideration and more people were now receiving higher rates.
Very worrying numbers and in my experience with casework these assessments are often wrong and always very distressing to #PiP claimants https://t.co/7LIlcj0dFu
— Angela Eagle (@angelaeagle) January 8, 2018
However, former welfare minister Ms Eagle said: “It is deeply worrying to see just how many people are being written off and given scores of zero for their PIP assessments.
“This reflects recent experience in my constituency, where increasing numbers of people are contacting me in great distress after receiving scores of zero.
“This includes people that have received PIP in the past, and have actually seen a deterioration in their health since then.”
Overall, 347,210 cases have scored zero on either or both parts of the PIP test since April 2016.
The figures obtained by Ms Eagle show that 15,320 people scored zero points on both parts of the test in October, the highest monthly figure over the previous year.
Between April and October the equivalent of little more than one in six tests scored zero on both parts, the lowest ratio since PIP launched in 2013.
Previous figures released to Parliament showed that in 2016, 13,130 people had a decision on PIP overturned having previously been scored zero.
More than 180,000 people who previously claimed Disability Living Allowance (DLA) have been denied PIP as they have transferred between the two systems.
Department for Work and Pensions (Kirsty O’Connor/PA)
“Under the Tory Government’s assessment process tens of thousands of people with chronic disabilities have had their payments removed, and many with mobility problems have had their vehicles taken from them,” said Ms Eagle.
“These figures show just how punitive the assessment process is, with vast numbers of people each year receiving scores of zero and not even coming close to receiving PIP.
“It is clear that the current system is failing people in real need and is not fit for purpose.”
A DWP spokeswoman said: “We introduced PIP to replace the outdated DLA system.
“PIP is a better benefit which takes a much wider look at the way an individual’s health condition or disability impacts them on a daily basis, and is tailored to suit each individual’s needs.
“Under PIP, 29% of claimants receive the highest rate of support, compared to 15% under DLA.
“Decisions for PIP are made after careful consideration of all the evidence provided by the claimant, including supporting evidence from their GP or medical specialist, and anyone who is unhappy with a decision can appeal.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel