William Hill is to pay a £6.2 million in penalties for “systemic social responsibility and money laundering failures”, the Gambling Commission has announced.
An investigation by the body revealed that, between November 2014 and August 2016, the bookmaker breached anti-money laundering and social responsibility regulations.
It also found that senior management failed to mitigate risks and to have sufficient staff to ensure that processes for adhering to the regulations were effective.
The failures also resulted in 10 customers being allowed to deposit large sums of money linked to criminal offences which saw gains for William Hill of more than £1.2 million.
Executive director of the Gambling Commission Neil McArthur said they will use the “full range” of enforcement powers to ensure gambling is fairer and safer.
“This was a systemic failing at William Hill which went on for nearly two years and today’s penalty package – which could exceed £6.2 million – reflects the seriousness of the breaches,” he said.
“Gambling businesses have a responsibility to ensure that they keep crime out of gambling and tackle problem gambling – and as part of that they must be constantly curious about where the money they are taking is coming from.”
The body said some of the issues it found include the bookie not adequately seeking information about the source of punter’s funds or establishing whether they were problem gamblers.
Examples of William Hill’s failures include one customer being allowed to deposit £654,000 over nine months without any source fund checks being carried out.
The Gambling Commission said the customer lived in rented accommodation and was employed within the accounts department of a business – earning around £30,000 a year.
Another incident saw one person allowed to deposit £541,000 over 14 months, after an assumption based on a verbal conversation was made that their potential income could top £365,000 a year, and no further probing undertaken.
In reality, the Gambling Commission said this person was earning £30,000 a year, and was stealing from their employer to fund the habit.
As a result of the investigation, William Hill will have to pay more than £5 million for breaching regulations and divest itself of the £1.2 million it earned from transactions with the 10 customers.
The Gambling Commission also said that, where victims of the 10 customers who used cash linked to crime are identified, they will be reimbursed.
If further incidents of failures relating to the case emerge, William Hill must also strip itself of any money made from these transactions.
According to the body, the bookmaker will also have to appoint external auditors to review the effectiveness and implementation of its anti-money laundering and social policies and procedures, and share findings with the wider industry.
Responding to the news, deputy Labour leader Tom Watson tweeted: “William Hill has just been fined £6.2m by the Gambling Commission for accepting money from criminals without carrying out proper background checks.
“And this is an industry that talks about ‘responsible gambling’. They’re turning a blind eye to dirty money.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here