WHEN they agreed back in 2013 that benefits from the Local Government Pension Scheme should be calculated on a career-average basis, councils across Scotland must have thought they were going to save themselves a fair amount of cash.
After all, if moving away from a final salary system reduced the amount of retirement income employees were entitled to surely it would reduce the liability each local authority faced too.
The problem is that a pay deal agreed in 2006 to make amends for women being paid less than men for doing equivalent work was itself discriminatory.
When the councils started being hit by a fresh wave of equal pay claims in relation to that they found the women had started demanding their pensions were re-rated too, with the move from final salary to career average having a direct impact.
Previously, moving a still-working woman up the pay scale would have been enough to put her at the right level for final salary benefits on retirement.
With career average, however, when past earnings are factored in the sum a woman’s pension is based on will be lower than it should be regardless of what she is earning on the day she retires.
Crucially, it would make her pension lower than that of a man earning the same at retirement.
For Stefan Cross QC, who is representing thousands of women with equal pay claims, that is why councils must allow their female workers to make up the pension contributions that were lost in the years they were being underpaid.
Anything less, he said, would mean the “discrimination is baked in for life”.
Yet as a 2017 report from gender equality charity the Fawcett Society highlighted, because they have earned less over their working lives women tend to be more conservative with their financial decisions than men, meaning many will be unlikely to part with any of their settlement in order to up their pension provision.
That is why the onus should be on the councils not just to offer female staff the chance to increase their contributions, but to highlight that it would be in their best interests to do so too.
Indeed, as Mr Cross discovered in Birmingham, while one woman had to pay £3,500 into her pension pot, it resulted in her retirement income increasing by £15,000 a year.
So many of the women that have brought claims against Glasgow and North Lanarkshire Councils have already been doubly discriminated against in the workplace – first by missing out on bonuses paid to men they shared a pay grade with and then by seeing those bonuses amalgamated with male colleagues’ pay as part of a deal that was supposed to level the playing field.
Ensuring that the value of their pensions can be re-rated in line with any fresh settlement will stop it happening for a third time.
As North Lanarkshire Council has found out, and Glasgow City Council is likely to discover, thanks to the career average move the retirement pay gap is just as big an issue as the gender pay gap in these equal pay disputes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here