Ads for photo printing firm Photobox showing a boy sitting on a dog have been cleared following more than 200 complaints that it was harmful to the pet and potentially unsafe for all involved.
The three television ads featured scenes of a family having a barbecue in the garden and showed parents taking a picture of their young son sitting on the back of a Great Dane.
A voice-over stated: “This pleasant get together shall soon be shattered for a photo storm bruise. Mum, dad, weird cousin Brian, hold aloft your camera phones for you are about to capture gold.”
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) and 211 other viewers complained that the ads involved a pose that was harmful to the dog and could encourage children or adults to emulate potentially unsafe behaviour for them and their pets.
Photobox said the boy and the dog were filmed completely separately so as to ensure the safety of both parties and “at no point did the boy actually sit on the dog”.
The company said a qualified vet was on set for the duration of the production and attested to the welfare of the dogs, and provided the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) with a copy of the certificate the vet had signed off.
The certificate referred to “Kalifa” and “Mufasa” and stated that the animals “were never placed under any risk or suffered any damage during the shooting”.
The ASA said: “We acknowledged the vet’s certificate provided by Photobox and (ad clearance agency) Clearcast, and were content that the two dogs used for the ad were not harmed during production.
“Because of that, we had no reason to believe the dogs used for the ad were mistreated during filming and concluded did not breach the Code.”
It added: “We acknowledged that an ex-kids scheduling restriction had been applied to the ad so that it would not be shown around children’s programming. We considered that this further made it unlikely for children to emulate the child sitting on the dog or come to harm as a result.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here