Hormone replacement therapy patches used to reduce symptoms of the menopause may preserve the brain and protect against Alzheimer’s, research suggests.
Over a period of seven years, treatment with the skin patches was associated with less age-related shrinkage of part of the brain involved with memory, thinking and reasoning.
Women whose brains responded in this way were also less likely to have a key hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease, scientists found.
Their brains contained fewer sticky clumps of beta-amyloid, a toxic protein fragment believed to help trigger the death of neurons.
But hormone replacement therapy (HRT) had no impact on scores in thinking and memory tests.
Lead researcher Dr Kejal Kantarci, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, US, said: “We found that one form of menopausal hormone therapy taken soon after menopause may preserve brain structure in the portion of the brain responsible for memory and thinking skills.
“It may also reduce the development of amyloid plaques that can build up and lead to memory loss.”
For the study, the researchers recruited 75 healthy women with an average age of 53 who were between five months to three years past the menopause.
Of those, 20 took a pill form of HRT, 22 received oestrogen-releasing skin patches, and 33 were given a “dummy” placebo treatment that was either a pill or a patch. Treatment was continued for four years.
Scans showed that women using the active patches maintained volume in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex brain region over the full period of the study, extending beyond the end of treatment.
Changes in the brain were also seen during therapy with oestrogen pills, but they ceased when the treatment stopped.
The findings are published in the journal Neurology.
Dr Kantarci said: “More research is needed to determine the biological reasons behind brain changes during menopausal hormone therapy.
“Future research is also need to better define just how the different hormonal products, pills versus skin patches, affect the brain.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article