MICHAEL Gove has accepted UK ministers could struggle to overturn a House of Lords defeat on the Government's flagship Brexit Bill when it returns to the Commons.

The Environment Secretary said the Government would have to “rely on the persuasive powers of ministers” to convince potential Tory rebels to support it.

On Wednesday, in the upper chamber an alliance of opposition peers, crossbenchers and Tory rebels combined to pass an amendment seeking to retain the option of a customs union with the EU.

The UK Government sought to play down the defeat, arguing that it did not commit the country to a customs union and simply required ministers to make a statement explaining the steps it was taking.

But with a number of pro-EU Tory MPs thought to be strongly sympathetic to the amendment, Mr Gove acknowledged the Government might not have the numbers to reverse the vote when the EU Withdrawal Bill returns to the Commons next month.

"It is the case that there are lots of potential future votes - given the arithmetic in the House of Commons, given the fact that we don't have a majority - which are always going to rely on the persuasive powers of ministers to get colleagues to support the Government," he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Later, Theresa May’s spokesman did not accept the characterisation that the Lords had given the Prime Minister a “bloody nose,” saying: “We are disappointed Parliament has voted for the amendments. 

“The fundamental purpose of the bill is to prepare our Statute Book for exit day. It is not about the terms of our exit.”

He went on: “In terms of the particular customs union amendment, it does not commit the UK to remain in a customs union with the EU, it requires us to make a statement in Parliament, explaining the steps we have taken. Our policy on this subject is very clear: we are leaving the customs union and will establish a new and ambitious customs arrangement with the EU while forging new trade relationships with our partners around the world.”

The spokesman added the Government would review the Lords’ decision when the bill returns to the Commons to “ensure we deliver a workable piece of legislation”.  He made clear the amended bill by the Lords would not do that.

For Labour - which supports a customs union - Sir Keir Starmer said the Opposition would fight to keep the amendment.

"The Labour Party will absolutely support this with a three-line whip and I suspect the other opposition parties will - save, of course for the DUP," said the Shadow Brexit Secretary.

"Then the Tory MPs who are concerned about this will have to decide whether they want to support it. I hope they do," he added.

Ministers argue that if the UK remains in a customs union with the EU after Brexit, it will be unable to strike its own free trade agreements with countries around the world.

Mr Gove added: "The case of being outside the customs union, being able to support our own free trade deals, is a compelling and persuasive one, and I know that when that case is put to the House of Commons it will rally Conservative MPs and others behind it."

Yesterday, peers inflicted a double defeat on the Government over the flagship Brexit legislation, amid claims they are attempting to prevent the UK leaving the EU.

Labour, the Liberal Democrats, Crossbenchers and backbench Tories formed an alliance over amendments to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, with one seeking to retain the option of a customs union with the EU and the other to protect people’s rights post-Brexit.

When one of the customs union amendments was pushed to a vote, peers voted overwhelmingly in favour by 348 votes to 225 – majority 123 – with another, linked amendment approved unopposed.

READ MORE: SNP pressed on data firm row as Sturgeon and Blackford at odds

The House of Lords Library reported the 573 peers involved in the vote was the seventh largest turnout ever in the chamber’s history, and included a sizeable Tory rebellion.

A total of 24 of the party’s peers supported the amendment, including former cabinet ministers Lord Heseltine, Lord Lansley and former minister Lord Willetts.

The Department for Exiting the European Union expressed its disappointment at the result.

Brexit minister Lord Callanan said the Government did not support the customs union measures as it would require it to report to Parliament on the steps taken towards delivering an objective it has “clearly ruled out”.

He signalled the Government’s intention to overturn the measures at a later stage, saying before the vote it had no intention to “reflect further” on the matter.

READ MORE: Fight over post-Brexit powers nearing "end game", says Sturgeon

A later vote on amendment 11 – a cross-party move from peers to ensure that existing protections across a range of areas including employment, equality, health and safety and consumer standards cannot be changed except by primary legislation – was approved by 314 votes to 217, majority 97.

The division list showed there were 14 Tory rebels on this vote.

The Bill transfers EU law into UK law but concerns have been raised over the use of so-called Henry VIII powers, which would allow ministers to amend EU rules and regulations when they are transferred on to the UK statute book with little parliamentary scrutiny.

Lord Callanan argued that he believed the Government had already taken steps to address the concerns, “potentially in ways that are even stronger than (Labour peer Lady Hayter’s) amendment”.

Crossbench peer Lord Kerr of Kinlochard, an author of Article 50, opened the Bill’s report stage by moving the cross-party customs union proposal and arguing there is a need to try to “limit the damage” of the UK leaving its largest market.

Lord Kerr said: “The country voted narrowly to leave the European Union, but no one can argue that it voted knowingly to leave the customs union with the European Union.”

Tory former Cabinet minister and European commissioner Chris Patten also supported the proposal, noting there were times in a political career where party loyalty “comes way behind trying to stand up for the national interest”.

READ MORE: SNP pressed on data firm row as Sturgeon and Blackford at odds

But Conservative Viscount Ridley said of the amendment: “It’s an attempt to wreck this Bill and to prevent Brexit.”

Earlier he took aim at the Lib Dems, saying: “Ricardo, Cobden, Gladstone, those great Liberals would be spinning in their grave at the thought that their descendant party today is in favour of this form of trade discrimination.”

Conservative former chancellor Lord Lawson of Blaby said Vote Leave made it “absolutely clear” leaving the EU meant leaving the customs union and single market.

He dismissed trade arguments in favour of a customs union with the EU, adding: “I urge the House to reject what is in essence a wrecking amendment.”

Crossbench peer Lord Bilimoria, the founder of Cobra Beer, said the amendment was about “damage limitation” as he supported the UK remaining in the customs union.

Conservative former cabinet minister Lord Forsyth said the change being sought in relation to a customs union was “an attempt to create division and confusion” in the House of Commons in a bid to block Brexit.

He said it was seeking to make the UK’s withdrawal form the bloc “subject to some conditions about a customs union”.

He warned the amendments put forward in the unelected chamber were “putting the peers against the people”.

Lord Forsyth said: “What is going on here is an exercise by Remainers in the House who refuse to accept the verdict of the British people and I believe they are playing with fire.”

READ MORE: SNP pressed on data firm row as Sturgeon and Blackford at odds

Labour’s Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town said the amendment was “good for the governance of this country” and would save the economy £24 billion over the next 15 years.

In a statement, a Department for Exiting the European Union spokeswoman said: “We are disappointed that Parliament has voted for this amendment.

“The fundamental purpose of this Bill is to prepare our statute book for exit day, it is not about the terms of our exit.

“This amendment does not commit the UK to remaining in a customs union with the EU, it requires us to make a statement in Parliament explaining the steps we’ve taken.

“Our policy on this subject is very clear. We are leaving the customs union and will establish a new and ambitious customs arrangement with the EU while forging new trade relationships with our partners around the world.”