A new app could make cannabis use safer by helping those who take it understand how the drug is affecting them.
Developed by researchers at the University of Chicago in the US, ‘Am I Stoned’ uses a series of tasks designed to test memory, reaction time and attention – traits often impaired by cannabis use.
Still in its trial period, the app is designed to offer cannabis users a measure of how impaired the drug has made them, but is not intended to predict their ability to engage in activities, developers said.
Research team leader Harriet de Wit said the purpose of the app was to improve awareness around the drug’s impact.
“One of our long-term goals is for the app to improve the safety of cannabis use by making individual users more aware of their impairment,” she said.
“By gathering data from users in the field, the app will also contribute to the overall scientific knowledge in terms of how cannabis affects users.”
The initial test of the system saw 24 non-daily cannabis users consume a capsule containing either a placebo or 7.5 or 15 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the ingredient in cannabis that intoxicates users.
Participants then completed a range of tests designed to detect impairment on a computer and on a smartphone to test their motor skills and behaviour.
Doctoral student and research team member Elisa Pabon said more testing would be done to hone the skills of the app’s detection capabilities.
“The effects of THC on performance may be subtle, so we need highly sensitive tasks to detect impairments,” she said.
“It is likely that the computer tasks, which took 15 to 20 minutes to complete, were more sensitive to THC impairment because they provided more opportunity to detect a drug effect.”
The results of a first trial of the app will be presented at the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics annual meeting in San Diego this week.
The researchers said the next step is to improve the test’s sensitivity to detect impairment, ahead of a possible public release of the app in the future.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel