RBS chief Ross McEwan has vowed to press on with plans to close more than 50 branches in Scotland despite public anger.
Mr McEwan told Westminster’s Scottish Affairs Committee that he recognised the disappointment of customers facing bank closures but the decision was the “best way of going forward”.
The bank, which is majority-owned by the taxpayer, announced in December it would close 62 branches across Scotland, later giving a temporary reprieve to 10 of these until the end of 2018 for review.
Mr McEwan told MPs that the size of the Scottish network would not be reviewed again until at least 2020, but that there was no further opportunity for reprieve for the 52 facing closure.
Committee convener Pete Wishart asked what he would say in response to the “disappointment, frustration and anger” of those communities who would lose their local facility.
READ MORE: RBS branch closures Equality Act breach fear
Mr McEwan said he accepted “change is absolutely difficult”, adding “I do recognise that customers are very disappointed that their local branch is closing”.
He said: “What we’ve done here with a package of different ways of operating with this bank is, I think, the best way of going forward, that we can keep those services to our customers as well as moving away from physical distribution when it’s just not being used.”
He added: “We’ve not taken any of these closure decisions lightly.
“Let’s be clear, when we look at our customer behaviour the evidence is stark.
“Branch use has fallen dramatically – the great majority of our customers want to bank when it suits them and at all hours.
“They aren’t using a branch as their first point of call now at all. We have to respond to changing trends and we have to invest in a range of services to give customers what they want and what they expect.
“We will make a final decision on the 10 branches under review by the end of this year.
READ MORE: RBS branch closures Equality Act breach fear
“Setting them aside, I am comfortable with the size of our branch network in Scotland and I think it is right alongside all of our other services.
“I want to be clear our branches do remain a core part of our service and we will not look at the size of the network again in Scotland until at least 2020 to give customers, colleagues and the communities greater certainty.”
MPs were told that, contrary to claims by the Unite union that there would be 179 compulsory job cuts, there would be a maximum of 12 compulsory redundancies at the affected branches.
READ MORE: RBS branch closures Equality Act breach fear
The committee also heard that no external reviewer has yet been appointed to carry out the review of the 10 branches offered a reprieve, despite it due to take place between June and August.
Mr McEwan denied that they were being “set up to fail” and insisted that he would take the recommendation of the review.
Mr Wishart asked: “Is there any chance or prospect of having another look at this again, given all the things that you’ve heard and all the anger and disappointment there is in these communities?”
Mr McEwan said: “We are reshaping this bank and our view was to reshape it in a way that we gave lots of other alternative services to customers.
“So yes, we are closing a number of branches and they will go ahead.
“We will review the 10 and we will seriously review those 10 – it’s not an olive branch we’re putting out.
“But we do need to push this organisation forward as customer behaviour is changing quite dramatically.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel