Officials in Seattle have unanimously approved a tax on large businesses such as Amazon and Starbucks to fund the fight against homelessness after weeks of heated debate and raucous hearings.
The city council backed a compromise plan that will charge large businesses about 275 US dollars per full-time worker each year less than the 500 US dollars per worker initially proposed.
Members of the public at the meeting where Seattle City Council backed a ‘head tax’ on large companies to raise money to fight homelessness (Elaine Thompson/AP)
The so-called head tax would raise about 48 million dollars a year to pay for affordable housing and homeless services.
The debate over who should pay to solve a housing crisis exacerbated by Seattle’s rapid economic growth comes amid rocketing housing prices and rising homelessness.
The Seattle region had the third-highest number of homeless people in the US and saw 169 homeless deaths last year.
Council members who sponsored the initial proposal said 48 million dollars a year was not enough to address the city’s urgent housing needs but conceded they could not get the six votes needed for a larger tax and to override a potential veto by the mayor, who favoured a lower rate and faced intense pressure from businesses.
People fill the hallway before the Seattle City Council meeting (Elaine Thompson/AP)
Amazon raised the stakes this month when it halted construction planning on a 17-storey tower near its hometown headquarters as it awaited a vote. It also was rethinking filling office space in another leased building. The two office spaces would accommodate about 7,000 new Amazon jobs.
Amazon vice president Drew Herdener said in an emailed statement that the company was disappointed by the council’s decision to introduce “a tax on jobs”.
While Amazon has resumed construction planning on the downtown building, he said the company is “apprehensive about the future created by the council’s hostile approach and rhetoric toward larger businesses, which forces us to question our growth here”.
He noted that Seattle revenue has grown dramatically and that the city “does not have a revenue problem – it has a spending efficiency problem”.
Businesses and others who say the tax is misguided and potentially harmful question whether the city is effectively using the tens of millions of dollars it already spends on homelessness each year.
Supporters insist that Amazon and others that have benefited from Seattle’s prosperity and contributed to growing income inequality should pay.
Ami Huntley speaks in favour of the proposed ‘head tax’ (Elaine Thompson/AP)
Council member Lisa Herbold, one of the tax’s sponsors, said she grappled with the compromise package, given how many people are struggling, but that it was the “strongest proposal” they could bring forward.
“People are dying on the doorsteps of prosperity. This is the richest city in the state and in a state that has the most regressive tax system in the country,” said council member Teresa Mosqueda, who supported a larger tax but called the plan “a down payment” to build housing the city needs.
They voted as people packed the meeting, holding signs saying “People before profits” and chanting “Housing is a human right”.
Seattle City Council member Debora Juarez, right, speaks as council members Kshama Sawant, left, and Teresa Mosqueda listen before the vote to approve the tax (Elaine Thompson/AP)
Other cities have implemented similar taxes, but critics say Seattle’s tax could threaten the booming local economy and drive away jobs.
Nearly 600 large for-profit employers – about 3% – making at least 20 million dollars in gross revenue would pay the tax, which would begin in 2019.
Amazon, the city’s largest employer with 45,000 workers, would take the biggest hit.
The tax would end after five years with a review in the last year to determine whether or not it should continue.
The company’s threat to pause its growth in Seattle comes as 20 cities vie to lure the company’s second headquarters and as it expands its workforce in Boston and Vancouver, British Columbia.
People pack the Seattle City Council meeting (Elaine Thompson/AP)
Proponents say people are dying on the streets, and, while city-funded programmes found homes for 3,400 people last year, the problem deepens.
Shannon Brown, 55, who has been living in a tiny home at a south Seattle homeless encampment, said there is simply not enough housing for the city’s poorest people.
“I live in a little shed, but it’s better than living in a tent or in a sleeping bag on the street,” she said as she queued for an hour before Monday’s meeting began.
“There’s no way I can afford to live in Seattle. I don’t understand why businesses think it’s wrong to help.”
John Boufford with the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades said he did not understand rhetoric against Amazon, which he noted provides good jobs for thousands of people.
“They’re driving this economic engine,” he said. “I’m confused about why the city of Seattle is fostering an adversarial relationship with businesses in this city.”
The city spent 68 million dollars on homelessness last year, and some said they wanted to see the city prioritise its money better.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here