A clip of sounds is dividing the world.
Listen to the clip below, can you hear “Laurel” or “Yanny”? The internet is divided.
YouTuber Cloe Feldman shared the clip of sound, which originated on Reddit, on Tuesday and it immediately began to pick up traction.
The clip spread like wildfire, with celebrities and mere mortals alike letting their followers know what they heard.
So what’s really going on? A number of theories have emerged in the wake of the clip going viral.
For Josh Beard of the Nerd It Up podcast, it’s all a matter of pitch. In a video posted to YouTube, he lowered and increased the pitch of the clip, changing what word he heard.
When Beard turns the pitch up, “Laurel” can be heard. When he turns it down, “Yanny” emerges.
The quality of the clip could also be a factor, Bharath Chandrasekaran, a professor in the department of communications sciences and disorders at the University of Texas told The Verge.
“It’s a little bit noisy, so that itself causes perception to be a little more ambiguous,” he said. “Because it’s noisy, your brain is filling in with what it thinks it should be.”
Others said it’s not all down to the clip. Factors such as age, where you are from and what you may expect to hear could affect which word you hear.
Professor David Alais, from the University of Sydney’s school of psychology, told the Guardian that the phenomenon could be explained because older people lose the ability to hear higher frequencies, and the difference in accent for Australian or British listeners could cause confusion.
“All of this goes to highlight just how much the brain is an active interpreter of sensory input, and thus that the external world is less objective than we like to believe,” he said.
The debate rages on, but this guy hears something totally different.
Sorry. We couldn’t help ourselves.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here