Here’s a look at Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s wedding in numbers:
0 – Maids of Honour – all the bridesmaids will be children
1 – Best man – Harry’s brother, the Duke of Cambridge
1 – Hour – the length of the wedding ceremony
2 – rings – one for each. Not all royal grooms have chosen to wear one.
2 – Diamonds from Diana, Princess of Wales’s collection used for Ms Meghan’s engagement ring, plus one from Botswana
3 – Diana’s siblings at the service
4 – the number of pageboys at the service, including Prince George. There will also be six bridesmaids, including Princess Charlotte.
6 – Harry’s position in line to the throne
6 – Windsor Grey horses taking part in the carriage ride
7 – Charities Harry and Meghan picked to receive public donations instead of wedding gifts
16 – The wedding will be the 16th royal wedding or blessing to take place in St George’s Chapel since 1863
20 – the temperature in degrees centigrade forecast by Meteogroup for Windsor as the ceremony begins at 1200
33 – Harry’s age
36 – Meghan’s age
200 – Guests invited to the Frogmore House evening reception
200 – the number of Amalfi lemons being used in the cake recipe being created by baker Claire Ptak.
600 – Congregation in St George’s Chapel
2,640 – People specially invited into the grounds of the castle including: 100 school children; 200 people from charities linked to Harry and Meghan; 530 members of the Royal Households and Crown Estate; 610 Windsor Castle community members; and 1,200 members of the public nominated by Lord Lieutenants.
5,000 – UK and international media accredited in Windsor
100,000 – Estimated number of visitors in Windsor on the day
£6.3 million – Cost of policing the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s wedding in 2011.
26 million – the number of people who watched Harry’s brother William marry Kate Middleton on British TV on April 29 2011.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here