Nicola Sturgeon will have read the Growth Commission report with one central question in her mind.
Is it a package that will help her persuade voters of the economic case for independence?
The report certainly deals with some of the Yes side’s apparent difficulties in the 2014 referendum.
Read more: Jim Sillars: Growth Commission has depth, detail and intellectual rigour
Insisting that an independent Scotland would share the pound with the rest of the UK was an awkward sell given that the rest of the UK was insistent that it would not be willing to share.
But at the same time, it was also clear from the referendum polls that most voters wanted to keep the pound.
The Commission’s answer to this conundrum is to say that, for the first ten years of independence at least, Scotland would use the pound unilaterally - and simply accept that the country’s monetary policy was still being decided in Threadneedle Street.
Read more: David Bell: Growth Commission is a reasoned economic case but it won’t please everyone
The Yes side also struggled with the argument that an independent Scotland would have been unable to bail out Scotland’s two big banks during the 2008 financial crisis.
This is met by suggesting it would be little loss if the remaining largely nominal bank headquarters that now exist in Scotland in the wake of the financial crash were to move to London.
That would mean an independent Scotland would only have its local banks to worry about.
But Ms Sturgeon will have been looking for more than protection from enemy fire.
She will also have been looking for the positive economic case for independence.
By comparing Scotland with a dozen other, better off small countries, the Commission suggests a key argument could be that small is not just beautiful but bountiful too.
However, with one exception, there are few immediately arresting examples in the report of the steps that small countries have taken to make themselves prosperous.
Proposals for a ‘National Economic Strategy’ or a ‘Productivity Commission’ hardly seem likely set the heather alight.
The one exception is a ‘Come to Scotland’ campaign to welcome more migrants to Scotland.
But while Scotland may be less concerned about immigration than many voters in England, this could still prove quite a difficult prospect to sell.
Meanwhile, there is an acceptance that in its early years a small independent Scotland would have to establish its financial credibility by being prudent with its public finances.
That may be a realistic message, but that does not necessarily mean it will be a popular one.
John Curtice is Professor of Politics at Strathclyde University
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel