SCOTLAND Secretary David Mundell has said he does not currently support calls for a public inquiry into the fire that engulfed the Glasgow School of Art.
Mr Mundell expressed his "disbelief" that a blaze had broken out in the historic Mackintosh Building for the second time in four years, but it was "unhelpful" to speculate over the cause.
Answering an urgent question on the fire from Alison Thewliss, SNP MP for Glasgow Central, he said he did not support calls "at this stage" for an inquiry.
Ms Thewliss said: "Speculation at this time as to the future of the building and the cause of the fire is unhelpful and we should allow the experts within the fire and rescue service to do their own investigations to carry out the very detailed work that may take some time to reach a conclusion.
"It is very important that we get the answers to this and that we learn the lessons of this fire."
Mr Mundell agreed, saying: "Speculation at this time is unhelpful and that's why I don't support calls at this stage for a public inquiry.
"I believe that the investigations which would normally follow a fire and the detailed investigations that are under way should be allowed to carry out their course, and of course some of those investigations will be into the structural nature of the building and that will determine what in many ways can happen next."
He reiterated that the Government "stand ready to help again", after it gave £10 million to rebuild the school following the last fire.
"There was never a question about the need to rebuild and restore it when tragedy struck four years ago.
"The situation is far worse after the weekend's fire but I hope we can start with that aim in mind."
He said the Art School "itself was a work of art", and told MPs he would be visiting the site on Friday.
Ms Thewliss said the blaze was "a very, very sore loss for the city", as she paid tribute to the fire service who pumped water uphill from the River Clyde to douse the flames, and to the Salvation Army who provided Irn-Bru to the fire crews.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel