A Government minister has quit his position over plans for the expansion of Heathrow Airport.
International Trade Minister Greg Hands said he was standing down after it was made clear that Tory MPs would not have a free vote in Monday's Commons debate.
"As the Government will be whipping the vote on Monday, this means I am resigning from the Government," he wrote on Twitter.
"It has been an honour to serve the Prime Minister (and her predecessor) for the last 7 years and I wish the PM & the Government every continuing success."
The MP for Chelsea and Fulham said he had written to Theresa May explaining that he intended to honour a pledge to his constituents at last year's general election to vote against a third runway at Heathrow.
Mr Hands's announcement throws the spotlight on to Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who has been a long-standing opponent of Heathrow expansion.
The vote coincides with a meeting of EU foreign ministers which could provide an excuse for him to stay away, although it is not known whether he will be at the gathering in Luxembourg.
Officials said the expansion of Heathrow would create 114,000 extra jobs in the area around the airport by 2030.
Aviation minsiter Baroness Sugg said: "A third runway at Heathrow would bring benefits of up to £74 billion to passengers and the wider economy, creating tens of thousands of local jobs in the process.
"It is easy to take these benefits for granted but our latest illustration, showing expansion would create enough jobs to fill well over 600 passenger jets, spells out just what MPs will be voting for.
"This massive project will bring fantastic opportunities for UK businesses, workers and apprentices and we cannot afford to wait any longer to push ahead with it."
The Government also signalled it would make sure the extra capacity helped protect domestic routes.
Public service obligations would protect routes if required, which would also exempt them from air passenger duty.
Lady Sugg said: "About 15% of the new capacity will be used for flights to destinations within the UK or crown dependencies."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel