RESIDENTS living near to the Glasgow School of Art have have informed police that a series of small explosions rang out around half-an-hour before a fire erupted to devastate the Mackintosh masterpiece for the second time in four years, it has been claimed.
The Herald has been told that a number of residents have been interviewed by police and told detectives they heard four or five "bangs" in the vicinity.
One resident is said to have told the force that the "muffled pops" were sequential.
But when he looked out of his window he saw nothing and thought nothing more of it until he later saw flames rising from the building.
The alarm was raised at about 11.20pm and the explosions were heard sometime between 10.30pm and 11pm, it is understood.
At its peak, more than 120 firefighters battled the blaze which also severely damaged the O2 ABC music venue.
One resident said: "Several people heard a series of four or five small explosions, like muffled pops.
"Residents were told by police not to mention it. They have told this to the police and have all been interviewed and told not to discuss it any further."
A Police Scotland spokeswoman said they could not discuss what residents would have told them during their inquiries.
She added: "The cause of the fire is still to be established and we are working on a joint investigation with the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service.
"The investigation is at its very early stages. It is a complex inquiry and will take some time to complete."
Concerns about the safety of the surviving shell of Mack, have delayed a full survey of the damage until next week.
Visiting the site on Friday, Glasgow city council leader Susan Aitken said: “It is a dangerous building, there is no question about that. The facade has actually moved quite considerably - about six inches. There is an imminent danger of collapse.”
But about 40 households in the surrounding Garnethill area who remain displaced following the blaze say they are frustrated by the lack of access to their homes to collect essential items and the poor standard of alternative accommodation they have been offered.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel