Residents forced to move out after the Glasgow School of Art fire have been told it could be another three months before they are able to return to their homes.
At a meeting held yesterday, displaced residents quizzed Glasgow City Council building chiefs and council leader Susan Aitken on the possibility of gaining entry to their homes to collect belongings, but were told the site is "too dangerous".
Dozens of householders in the Garnethill area of the city were moved out as an exclusion zone was set up in the wake of last month's fire at the historic Mackintosh building.
Since the blaze, which took place on June 15, residents from 33 properties have been unable to access their homes.
Traders have also warned that it could spell the end for some businesses.
Surveyors have confirmed that sections of the art school will be dismantled as a matter of urgency because of the risk of the structure's sudden collapse, with work scheduled to begin today.
Raymond Barlow, assistant head of planning and building standards at Glasgow City Council, told yesterday's meeting this should provide a clearer picture on a timescale for residents.
He said: "What we established [during initial analysis of the site] was it was far, far worse than we had hoped for.
"We still truly don't know the condition of the building."
Residents were told attempts to reduce the cordon sooner will be made if it is deemed safe by contractors.
Councillor Aitken said: "We would not lightly displace 33 residences at one time but we don't have that timescale yet.
"The reality is we don't know that much. This is an unfolding situation."
She added: "After public safety, our next biggest priority is getting you back in your home as quickly as we can, but as quickly as we can is not going to be that quick.
"It's likely going to be two or three months."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel