Conservative MP Philip Davies has submitted a letter of no confidence in Theresa May’s leadership, saying that he has “lost trust” in her ability to deliver Brexit.
The Prime Minister could face a confidence vote if the chairman of the backbench 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady receives letters from 48 Tory MPs.
It is not known how many he has so far received, with Mr Davies becoming the third to go public, after Andrew Bridgen and Andrea Jenkyns.
Mr Davies’ move comes a day after fellow Eurosceptic Simon Clarke revealed he had withdrawn his own letter after changing his mind about trying to topple the Tory leader.
In a letter to voters in his Shipley constituency, obtained by the Yorkshire Post, Mr Davies said that Mrs May’s Chequers’ plan for Brexit was “unacceptable”.
And he added: “Politics is all about trust and once it is lost it is impossible to win back.
“Many people have told me that as a result of this they have lost trust in the PM to properly and fully deliver the referendum result.
“It is with much sadness that I have to say that I have also lost trust in her to deliver the referendum result too.”
Mr Davies said that Tories faced losing power to Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour if they failed to deliver the Brexit which the country voted for in the 2016 EU referendum.
“Failure to keep our promise to the electorate will almost certainly lead to the catastrophe of Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister and I cannot sit back and allow that to happen,” he wrote.
“This has not been an easy decision and I have agonised over it, but I know in my heart of hearts it is the right decision.”
If Sir Graham receives letters from 48 MPs – 15% of the parliamentary party – he must call a confidence vote in Mrs May’s leadership.
She would need to win the votes of more than half the Tories’ 316 MPs to survive.
Defeat for the Prime Minister would mean an election to choose a new leader, in which she would not be allowed to stand.
But if she won a confidence vote, she could not be challenged in this way again for another year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel