An axe-wielding shop assistant has been locked up for at least 24 years for a “ferocious” attack on a colleague over fears of being sent back to Pakistan.
Over-stayer Imran Muhammed hacked to death married father-of-seven Seyed Khan, 49, who suspected him of stealing money.
Mr Khan was taken by surprise and suffered at least 12 blows to the head when he turned up for a shift at A-Z Furniture and Carpets in Ilford, east London, on January 24.
Muhammed, 31, then wheeled the body in a shopping trolley from a nearby supermarket and dumped it in undergrowth at Ilford Cemetery, the Old Bailey heard.
He went on to clean up the blood and “coolly and deliberately” call police to report that he had been robbed and slashed with glass on the arm to “spin a false story”, the jury was told.
Mr Khan’s body was found eight days later after a search with a specially trained police dog, and the defendant was arrested in Glasgow.
Muhammed had previous convictions for dishonesty and was an over-stayer in the country, giving him a motive to kill, the court heard.
Jurors were told that, four days before the attack, Muhammed searched the internet for “how to kill a man with a hammer”, with a punch, and “brain injuries”.
The defendant, from Ilford, denied murder, maintaining he was being sexually attacked.
The jury rejected his explanation and convicted him by a majority of 11 to one after 13 hours and 25 minutes.
Mr Khan’s family attended the Old Bailey as Judge Anne Molyneux QC jailed Muhammed for life with a minimum term of 24 years.
He was also sentenced to five years concurrent having admitted perverting the course of justice.
Judge Molyneux said the killing of Mr Khan was “ferocious, brutal and without mercy”.
She told the defendant: “This was a premeditated attack. You are a liar, a manipulator and a thief and had once again been suspected of stealing.
“You attacked him savagely and brutally with the axe.
“You hit him to the head 12 times – the force was so great that you fractured his skull.
“The injury to the back of his hand shows he tried to defend himself. He never stood a chance against you.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article