A top security officer for French president Emmanuel Macron has been detained and is being questioned by authorities after he was caught on camera beating a protester.
The president’s office has begun the process of sacking Alexandre Benalla following a public backlash after the May Day footage emerged.
The newspaper Le Monde identified Benalla as the man in the video who was wearing a police helmet and beating a young protester.
Questions about whether Mr Macron’s cohorts are above the law were raised in the French parliament on Thursday.
The presidential Elysee Palace said Benalla had been authorised to follow police operations as an observer on his day off. He was suspended for two weeks and given a desk job, but was allowed to maintain his office at the presidential palace.
A video of the May 1 event in Paris shows Benalla, in a helmet with police markings and surrounded by riot officers, brutally dragging away a woman from a demonstration and then repeatedly beating a young man on the ground. The man is heard begging him to stop.
Another man in civilian clothing had pulled the young man to the ground.
Police, who had pulled the man from the crowd before Benalla took over, did not intervene, and Benalla then left the scene.
The second man was apparently a gendarme in the reserves who Le Monde said had worked with Benalla in the past.
Mr Macron was slammed for keeping Benalla on the job two and a half months after the May incident.
A judicial official said Benalla is being questioned on an array of counts ahead of potential charges. Among the counts is violence committed in a group by a person with a public service mission.
The judicial official said the gendarme was detained hours later.
An official at the presidential palace confirmed press reports that the process of sacking Benalla from his job had begun and that Mr Macron’s office had new elements in hand justifying the decision, notably Benalla’s possession of a document from police headquarters that he was not authorised to have, procured in an effort to prove his innocence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here