Scotland's most prominent writers have urged Nicola Sturgeon not to shelve reform of the country's antiquated defamation laws.
Val McDermid, Ian Rankin, Julian Barnes, James Robertson and A.L. Kennedy and 134 others have signed a joint letter to the First Minister after it was signalled a freedom of speech bill wound not make the new 2018 programme of government.
The writers are part of a campaign run by Scottish PEN, the freedom of expression group, in parallel with the The Herald's own Freedom of Speech campaign.
They remain concerned that unreformed laws are having a chilling effect on investigative journalists, scientists and - especially - local bloggers trying to expose wrongdoing by the rich and powerful. England and Wales have moved to bring their defamation laws i n to line with the internet age. Scotland has not followed suit.
The writers, who also include Sara Sheridan, Zoe Strachan, Philippe Sands, Karen Campbell, Christopher Brookmyre, Ron Butlin and Louise Welsh, said that “protecting free expression cannot wait any longer".
They added: "Every moment reform is delayed, writers, academics, scientists, journalists and social media users remain at risk from being threatened by legal action on the most minor of issues.”
The Scottish Law Commission produced a draft bill in December 2017, which included an English-style "serious harm" threshold to prevent trivial cases or those brought solely to silence criticism. The Law Commission also proposed created a statutory defence of publication on a matter of public interest and a single publication rule to ensure the time period within which a defamation action can be brought does not restart every time a link or post is shared or viewed online.
Nik Williams, Project Manager of Scottish PEN said: “It would be a missed opportunity for the First Minister to ignore the work and opinions of the Scottish Law Commission and the hundreds of people who took part in the public consultations to delay reform until September 2019.
"Scotland’s defamation laws are already significantly out-of-date and wholly inadequate for free expression in the modern age and any delay in reforming defamation law will continue to stifle public discourse and the ability of people to hold the powerful to account.”
Poet and novelist, James Robertson added : “The law of defamation in Scotland has not been revised in any significant way since before the Scottish Parliament was established, while in the same period the context of news media, public expression and communication has changed beyond all recognition.
"We need the law to recognise this new world, protecting both freedom of expression and reasonable rights of privacy, both key areas of a fully-functioning democracy.”
Actual defamation cases in the Scottish courts are rare. However, evidence from the National Union of Journalists and newspaper employers suggest threats of expensive legal action - or fears of threats - are blocking investigations.
Ms Sturgeon in April told a Scottish parliament committee that some of the English-style reforms, including a serious harm test, were "controversial", suggesting a potential delay. She said: "This is a sensitive area, an area where for very understandable reasons there are strong views and strong feelings." She added: "There are some quite thorny issues it is important to get right." The Scottish Government has since announced its own consultation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel